- Jun 30, 2010
- 49,605
- 222,077
- Disclosures
- musician/artist/owner - Gildaxe
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
We have had a wide range of responses; I see them all as valid, because we all get to think and act for ourselves. But I especially like the middle ground: I’d never suggest people need a Signature instrument, but as you state, many players have spent huge chunks of time working out a great approach with an instrument, so why not have those options out there?A thing that has recently occurred to me is that signature basses may be a good way for manufacturers to mix things up a little. They can get a popular player’s take on their instruments, and present something new and interesting that many buyers might want.
Granted, we’re all rugged individualists here on TB, but every time I’ve I gone to a masterclass or clinic with a well-known bassist, the majority of the questions are usually about strings, pickups, and how they get their tone. A signature bass could be a good shortcut for the buyer, and good marketing for the manufacturer.
That's easy enough.Also toying with the idea of buying a used Duff McKagan body (not a fan of block inlays or painted headstocks on a P-bass) and adding a replacement neck, as the idea of a passive P/J P-bass appeals to me.

Yeah. I've had an active tab on that body for a while now. Still trying to decide between a 'C to D' neck and a Jazz neck with Precision logo.
That's what I do with all of my basses. I haven't yet started with someone else's signature bass, but I always wind up with a new signature bass of my own. Unfortunately, the endorsement checks seem to get lost in the mail or something.The last few posts reveal a new concept: if a Signature bass gives you most of what you want in a dream bass but isn’t perfect, I think we should feel free to mod it to make it perfect. After all, that s the way most of these things ended up as Signature instruments…the artist continually modded an instrument to make it perfect for him/her. Why shouldn’t we do the same thing?
I just got my first Allparts neck. I recommend them highly. On par with Warmoth at a lower price.Also toying with the idea of buying a used Duff McKagan body (not a fan of block inlays or painted headstocks on a P-bass) and adding a replacement neck, as the idea of a passive P/J P-bass appeals to me.

Please tell us where the Matt Freeman neck is currently available, plenty of us would be interested in that, I think?Squier Matt Freeman Precision
Absolutely!The last few posts reveal a new concept: if a Signature bass gives you most of what you want in a dream bass but isn’t perfect, I think we should feel free to mod it to make it perfect. After all, that s the way most of these things ended up as Signature instruments…the artist continually modded an instrument to make it perfect for him/her. Why shouldn’t we do the same thing?
Hmmm...can't tell if "sarcasm" or not.Please tell us where the Matt Freeman neck is currently available, plenty of us would be interested in that, I think?
It's not sarcasm: the neck on that bass is famous, despite the bland "modern C shape" description. So, yes, there is "something missing" from the listed specs.Hmmm...can't tell if "sarcasm" or not.
Assuming it isn't sarcastic, and unless there's something missing from the specs listed, it's pretty much a standard, all-maple P-bass neck; 9.5" radius, 20-frets, modern "C" shape, "vintage" frets (whatever that means), etc...etc...
This “I’m nit a Fanboi” boy would do almost anything for a Chris Squire Sig Bass!Absolutely!
If I were to somehow have a Chris Squire Signature Rickenbacker fall into my hands, I’d slap an aluminum Hipshot bridge on it immediately.
Cool!It's not sarcasm: the neck on that bass is famous, despite the bland "modern C shape" description. So, yes, there is "something missing" from the listed specs.
I used to have a Matt Freeman P, and found the neck profile on that deeply preferable to those of my two US-built G&Ls. When a damaged shoulder meant I had to get rid of my non-light basses, I should have simply found a lighter body and tuners for that bass instead of wasting money on G&Ls.
I get that some people don't care about neck profiles, perhaps you're one, but to claim that you can put together a Matt Freeman bass with current available parts is simply not true. Unless someone somewhere is recreating that neck, in which case, "plenty of us would be interested in that".
In a similar way, the JMJ Mustang has a neck unlike any other Mustang made by Fender or Squier. This is partly what leads people to buy it even if they otherwise don't like the idea of signature basses. If that neck turns out to be your favorite Mustang feel, it's the only one to choose.It's not sarcasm: the neck on that bass is famous, despite the bland "modern C shape" description. So, yes, there is "something missing" from the listed specs.
I used to have a Matt Freeman P, and found the neck profile on that deeply preferable to those of my two US-built G&Ls. When a damaged shoulder meant I had to get rid of my non-light basses, I should have simply found a lighter body and tuners for that bass instead of wasting money on G&Ls.
I get that some people don't care about neck profiles, perhaps you're one, but to claim that you can put together a Matt Freeman bass with current available parts is simply not true. Unless someone somewhere is recreating that neck, in which case, "plenty of us would be interested in that".
You needed an asterix to explain where that came from*Wild boar? Maybe what Vigier needed to make was an Obelix signature.