• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Silly Silly Cable Q.

Sorry, I don't have an answer for the cable, but I do have a comment on the video, after watching it for the first time just now

Marcus says

"On some of your amps you may have seen one input is an active bass, and one's for passive, but this is not an amp, this is a preamp, and on the preamp, they're both the same"

That has to be one of the stupidest things I've heard recently. :scowl:
 
What I'd like to know is why we even have to bother with a padded input for active basses. I've used both active and passive basses of many kinds, and never used an active input or pad because the only thing they do is cut output. I can do that with a knob. If you need to use the active input, IMHO you're putting way too much boost on it.
 
What I'd like to know is why we even have to bother with a padded input for active basses.
Technically speaking a well done pre would have different input impedances on the two, to better match the high output impedance of passives versus the low impedance output of actives. I doubt that's the case most of the time. A simple pad down would be intended for those who run their instrument volume controls in one position: full. In that case better to have the option and not need it than the other way around.
 
Technically speaking a well done pre would have different input impedances on the two, to better match the high output impedance of passives versus the low impedance output of actives. I doubt that's the case most of the time. A simple pad down would be intended for those who run their instrument volume controls in one position: full. In that case better to have the option and not need it than the other way around.
Fair enough. I've never needed it but I guess I'm not everybody. I should be, though ;)