Exactly how small? Give us numbers. The range that was being discussed was 2"-2.9", 1st percentile for men, 5th for women. Are you in that range?
Just measured them (cause I'm a good sport) at almost exactly 2.9", but my point wasn't about statistical pecentiles (as you seem to want to now narrow commenter's to a specific criteria for their input) it was that if I can with my small hands navigate successfully an instrument with a neck the size of an aircraft carrier than it should mean that folks with similar hand characteristics shouldn't immediately be intimidated by a standard size 4 or 5 string bass (which when I play my four strings seem like toothpicks now that I am fully acclimated to the seven).
Who said ONLY solution? We're talking about OPTIONS. Very different.
Perhaps I am misreading your comment (I don't see any point in focusing on anyone else in this thread as you were the one who asked me questions about my reply). But I took this:
I'd still recommend a short scale bass to at least start out on. It'll give you a better chance of getting the right techniques down. Go with what's comfortable, because you want to be able to put in a lot time with the instrument.
as a firm recommendation of short scale basses.
Not talking about 3/4 size- that's the standard size. Talking about the 1/2 sizes. They exist for violins to, so nothing to do with height there (in the case of violin) Morever, the point is that for kids and smaller adults, there are options to make playing more comfortable.
Yeesh...so I got one little incident of misreading the posts. Sue me.
To be clear NO ONE has said "The only bass a small hand person can play is a small scale".
I'll give you this one although based on the quote from you above I might still disagree with you just a tad.
I am also just a little curious if you missed my post's close that this was all "IMHO".
As with your posts I was simply trying to give my perspective. Folks often think that the advice they give is the only advice folks should take and when it is challenged react strongly to the challenger. I think you were in fact giving your perspective with all good intent and my effort to not single out posters by name but simply refering to the seemingly strong advice to "start with a short scale". I am playing devils advocate for sure. It is partly based on my own experience as a young man and my long term experience as a player (40 years and going strong). Often younger players will listen to or emulate folks they believe know more than they do. Often times they will also start with an instrument and stay with it for countless years, afraid to change or experiment on thier own (this is particularly true if they have some limited success as a musician). I offered my opinion based on this so that it was clear that it could be done and if they wish to start with an instrument of fuller size that with time and effort it was an achievable alternative.
I also remember the early days when legendary bass players often had tremendous hands to boot. Us small guys often had a self imposed concern that we couldn't possibly do some of the more challenging techniques because our hands were "too small". I once even had a fellow tell me that I really should just give up bass and play guitar because I could never play like Stanley or Jaco because my hands were "like a girls".
So take offense at my post if you will. Accuse me of not being "qualified" to comment because my hands might not be within the range of discussion. Point out my inaccuracies if that makes you feel better. I came to help nothing more and I stand by my experience and the comments I gave.
Spin out.