jdthebassman
play to live live to play
it is not your job to bring in people it is to keep them there entertained.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If you do the math, you can see why venue owners are reticent to hire unknown bands. We get $100/man for a 3 hour gig (chicken feed, we know). That's $500. To cover that nut that the owner needs to put about $2000 or more (that's 50 people spending at least $40 each) in the till in excess of what he would without the band. That's a lot of beer and pub grub. Now, if he hires a solo at $100 for the same three hours, he only needs to see $500 in additional sales (or 25 people spending $20 each). It's just arithmetic.
If a club CAN attract a crowd on it's own merits, why do they need to hire you in the first place?
EDIT - Not trying to be snarky, looking for a legitimate cost/benefit reason
it is not your job to bring in people it is to keep them there entertained.
If a club CAN attract a crowd on it's own merits, why do they need to hire you in the first place?
EDIT - Not trying to be snarky, looking for a legitimate cost/benefit reason
I was recently asked this question by a bar owner when pitching my band. There seems to be two schools of thought on this. Musicians seem to think it is up to the club/bar owner to properly promote an act while club owners seems to think they are paying a band to bring people into their club. I know from my own experience in past bands, if we fail to bring people into a club, that's probably going to be the last time we are asked to play that establishment.
In my last band, this was not a problem as the BL was also a bar tender and new many of the club owners. He also had a large family and many friends in the area. Unfortunately this is not the case with this band, so I think we might be in a tough spot when it comes to booking gigs despite the fact that the band sounds really good.
Has anyone else run into this and how did you overcome it?
I'm not even talking about making a profit ... I'm talking about just covering the expense!Most times these days its because the owner or manager likes live music. Its very hard to make any extra profit in a venue by putting on live music.
Am I the only one that wished musicians played music, promoters promoted and club owners stayed out of the way?I was recently asked this question by a bar owner when pitching my band. There seems to be two schools of thought on this. Musicians seem to think it is up to the club/bar owner to properly promote an act while club owners seems to think they are paying a band to bring people into their club. I know from my own experience in past bands, if we fail to bring people into a club, that's probably going to be the last time we are asked to play that establishment.
In my last band, this was not a problem as the BL was also a bar tender and new many of the club owners. He also had a large family and many friends in the area. Unfortunately this is not the case with this band, so I think we might be in a tough spot when it comes to booking gigs despite the fact that the band sounds really good.
Has anyone else run into this and how did you overcome it?