• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Sonata 1963

This is one of my favorite solo pieces for bass. It has modern harmony, rhythmic variety, it lays very well on the instument, it's lyrical and has some flash. What's not to like? First, get the recording of Frank Proto playing this piece. It really gives you some insight as to what he was thinking. A few things off the top of my head...
Mvt. 1 - Don't go too overboard with vibrato. The line has a very natural arch to it through the movement, and I believe there should be a slow and steady build to a peak which then resolves all the way to the low D.
Mvt. 2 - This may be the hardest movment for "classical" bassists. Put the bow down. Swing it hard. I think the indicated tempo is a bit fast for what is happening in the music, so don't be afraid to back it off. Personally I really like this movement at around 130 bpm because it can get into a nice groove.
Mvt. 3 - Romantic and mysterious. Really try to let the artificial harmonics sing.
Mvt 4 - Burn it down. The ends of the 3rd and 4th movements are the same, and there are some logical places to shift if you use the harmonics as guide points. Make the 16th runs as crisp as you can using a very controlled bow. You don't want to saw a tree down at 160bpm.

I found the trickiest part to this piece is finding a pianist that can play it, and then coordinating the music with them. The piano part is very dense and reminds me of something Hindemith might write. I did an analysis of this piece for a class during my undergrad, and I'd be happy to talk about it further if you'd like.

All the best,
Pat
 
This is one of my favorite solo pieces for bass. It has modern harmony, rhythmic variety, it lays very well on the instument, it's lyrical and has some flash. What's not to like? First, get the recording of Frank Proto playing this piece. It really gives you some insight as to what he was thinking. A few things off the top of my head...
Mvt. 1 - Don't go too overboard with vibrato. The line has a very natural arch to it through the movement, and I believe there should be a slow and steady build to a peak which then resolves all the way to the low D.
Mvt. 2 - This may be the hardest movment for "classical" bassists. Put the bow down. Swing it hard. I think the indicated tempo is a bit fast for what is happening in the music, so don't be afraid to back it off. Personally I really like this movement at around 130 bpm because it can get into a nice groove.
Mvt. 3 - Romantic and mysterious. Really try to let the artificial harmonics sing.
Mvt 4 - Burn it down. The ends of the 3rd and 4th movements are the same, and there are some logical places to shift if you use the harmonics as guide points. Make the 16th runs as crisp as you can using a very controlled bow. You don't want to saw a tree down at 160bpm.

I found the trickiest part to this piece is finding a pianist that can play it, and then coordinating the music with them. The piano part is very dense and reminds me of something Hindemith might write. I did an analysis of this piece for a class during my undergrad, and I'd be happy to talk about it further if you'd like.

All the best,
Pat

Thanks Pat,
I'll keep those points in mind. I'm really lucky to have my musical partner in crime be a very talented jazz and classical pianist. Hopefully he'll be able to tear through the accompaniment pretty easily.
 
I've been working on this one lately with one of my neighbors who's a pianist, and I agree that the piano part is challenging...but it makes this sonata really really great IMO.

Frank Proto recorded this and you can get it from Slava. We've been listening to it to help us get more cozy with rhythms and get what he meant when he wrote something or another. I second the recommendation! :bassist: