TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sampling = no talent required.
Take someone elses tune and change the words, where's the skill in that?
P Diddy has made a fortune doing it, so there must be alot of people out there who think like you.
I am a true believer of making money and what that comes down to giving the people what they want. The masses like what they are familiar with.
If that's what a guy has to do to pay the bills, more power to him, I just dont think there is talent required.
Wierd Al did pretty much the same with his parodys.
conical johnson: I understand your position and the point you are making, It is just not where I am coming from. What is really wrong with two people having two different opinions on the same subject?
I am truly aware that people have written music that sounds like someone else's music. That could be a total coincidence or maybe even some subconscious influence from a song heard in the past. Hell, there are only 12 note in music it would be kind of hard to do something that has not been done by someone before. BUT that is not what we are talking about here.
What I am saying is that hearing someone else's work and saying "I like that so I am going to put it on my next album" doesn't talk a whole lot of skill. It borders on plagiarism. It doesn't impress ME much.
I value the artists ability to have an original thought, and not just cherry picking the efforts of others and rearranging them.
As far as my taste in music, I have been heavy into the blues for about the last year, so believe me, I know how tough it is to try to not make one 12 bars song sound just like another.
Sometimes impossible! that being said, just copying some BB King backlines and throwing new vocals on top would be an acceptable blues art form by some - but it doesnt make for musicianship in my book. OK?
Ice Ice Baby! = Under Pressure.
What about people using the same chord progressions?
What I am saying is that hearing someone else's work and saying "I like that so I am going to put it on my next album" doesn't talk a whole lot of skill. It borders on plagiarism.
and throwing new vocals on top would be an acceptable blues art form by some - but it doesnt make for musicianship in my book. OK?
Just the way my brain works (and the fact that I listen to so much music), but almost anything I hear reminds me of something I've heard before.
Often times I think it's convergent evolution or subconscious association rather than willful thievery, but it happens a lot nonetheless.
I'm sure I'm not the first to point these out, but here's some:
Flaming Lips Fight Test and Cat Stevens Father and Son
(I think there was even a lawsuit over this one)
The Offspring Why Don't You Get A Job and The Beatles Ob-La-Di
Led Zeppelin Going To California and Pearl Jam Given To Fly
Also, The Eels Mr. E's Beautiful Blues uses the exact same bassline, drums and punctuated guitar stabs as Otis Redding's "Look At the Girl" (which I can't find a video of) with no credit given. This one wasn't an accident, though I do like both songs.
Oh and here's an interesting couple videos that I found. I forgot about Paris Hilton completely ripping off UB40. That one made me really angry. I heard her "song" and turned up my radio thinking it was Kingston Town. Ugh
Similarities in Songs
Similarities in Songs II

. Or Harry Partch's music which uses 43 notes per octave. Now I'm just being a contrary ass, though.![]()