Always loved the T-38; just a beautiful design.
And at least twice as good for bullseyeing womp rats.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Always loved the T-38; just a beautiful design.
Yay! Glad to be wrong about this!
Wow. Was only originally scheduled for 5 test flights, 50 flights and still setting new records is pretty amazing! I'm hoping whoever designed it is getting recognized for kicking some major @$$!!
The 17th of April…back up days are the 18th and 19th.Sweet. What's the latest guess on the date.
Well look at the competition it's running against - Spaceship is at least as far along and "real" as the competition (much of which is vaporware). And I understand Musk's desire (nay, need) to "put all resources forward" - yes, he's making a big bet, trying to force it to happen via will alone. I wouldn't bet against him. Far better to sink those resources into the future than building gimmicks on the past...Still can't believe it was chosen for a lander. Doesn't make sense to me, for round 1 of the return to the moon.
Well look at the competition it's running against - Spaceship is at least as far along and "real" as the competition (much of which is vaporware). And I understand Musk's desire (nay, need) to "put all resources forward" - yes, he's making a big bet, trying to force it to happen via will alone. I wouldn't bet against him. Far better to sink those resources into the future than building gimmicks on the past...
Correct. But IMHO, that's a "Moon sooner, Mars never" kind of plan. And we know how Elon feels about Mars!If, a couple of years ago, we locked and loaded on Falcon Heavy and Dragon derivatives for the return to the moon, we'd be back there today.