...but first, a word from our sponsors and the suits.A lot of talking…

Oh well. Not everybody is as slick as SpaceX.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
...but first, a word from our sponsors and the suits.A lot of talking…


Really though, I would guess there aren’t any live pictures of the process…...but first, a word from our sponsors and the suits.
Oh well. Not everybody is as slick as SpaceX.![]()
Yep. Flying behind the moon, it's not talking to anybody...Really though, I would guess there aren’t any live pictures of the process…


I can neither confirm nor deny... Nevermind.Yep. Flying behind the moon, it's not talking to anybody...
...that we know of.
![]()
Hard to work the quote function with those floppy tentacle-fingers isn't it, Mr. Alien!I can neither confirm nor deny... Nevermind.

Some of the scuttlebutt over on Ars mentions plans to do some upgrades to the launch pads, including the addition of flame trenches. From the look of the "excavation" done to the launch pad this morning, that seems like a good idea:
Down to, and below the footings!![]()
![]()
Uh-oh... Looks like you were right. Sounds like a loss (in either language).I was watching the speed/altitude calculating the acceleration required, and not feeling hopeful. I hope I'm wrong.
Reminds me of a funny story i heard way back when, about the root cause finding of particulate defects in a chip fab.Even a ham sandwich would look epic in a clean assembly room...
Right up until somebody gets chewed out for bringing a ham sandwich into the clean assembly room.![]()
Ya, sorry I erased my post…I didn’t think anyone saw it….oops.scrubbed for today - T-0:16 called for "probability of landing failure" - hmmm.
Well, it escaped me, at least.Ya, sorry I erased my post…I didn’t think anyone saw it….oops.