• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SPECTOR 4 USA BOLT ON OR RICKENBACKER 4003

Which one is better? build,quality sound etc.

  • Spector USA 4 bolt-on

    Votes: 23 44.2%
  • rickenbacker 4003

    Votes: 29 55.8%

  • Total voters
    52
  • Poll closed .
Try 'em both if you can.
I know, not normally an option, but if you can try the 4003 with an option to return it might be worth the extra effort.
There is stock in hand at some dealers. depending on the finish you're interested in.

I'm extremely happy with my brand new 4003 (3rd week of 2010), I had high expectations and these have been surpassed, but then I'm a long time Rick owner and know what to expect, with vintage ones at any rate. Never played a Spector, there are none in my area that I'm aware of.

It's a very personal choice and no one else can make it for you, though.
 
I've got 100s of hours on each. I have decided to steer away from these maple bodied basses, because they are too dark for my music. The Spector is the natural choice for metal. The Ric would work and surprise more people. Make sure to consider comfort. The Spector body shape is way more comfortable and less delicate, due to it's small body shape and contours.
 
Let's not act like a Ric is a one-trick pony that can only play one thing.

Obligatory Youtube vids
Iron Maiden's - Rime of the Ancient Mariner

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Motley Crue - Looks That Kill

This is a varied selection with some metal thrown in. If you want to see more, this guy had done a lot of tunes.

While you may not can avoid the Rickenbacker "sound", it's not like you can't play metal or any style of music with one. You most certainly can as these videos show.

With that said, get the one you feel most comfortable with. If you like the Spector, get it. Don't let anyone tell you that you're wrong.

Personally, I've played the Spector for a short time through a bad amp so I'd rather not comment since that will cloud my judgement, I'm sure.

Also, R.I.P. LRRG zodiakironfist.
 
The only thing that a Ric can't do well IMO is Funky jazzy Jaco type stuff. It can, and will excel, at just about everything else. Ergonomics and feel are what you really want to pay attention to here.

Honestly though you need to play both of these to decide. Ric's are notorious for being love/hate for a lot of people and I recommend people play them before shelling out the cash for one.
 
The only thing that a Ric can't do well IMO is Funky jazzy Jaco type stuff. It can, and will excel, at just about everything else. Ergonomics and feel are what you really want to pay attention to here.

Honestly though you need to play both of these to decide. Ric's are notorious for being love/hate for a lot of people and I recommend people play them before shelling out the cash for one.

Good points, but a Rick can do funky jazz, as evidenced by missgingerlee:



I know, not specifically what the OP asked about, but it does showcase the versatility of these basses, granted a 4002 is a far cry from a 4003 in terms of rarity.
 
Everyone, i have a samash near me that sells both, i went up there, and in general, i like the sound of the rick more, dont get me wrong i loved the spector, but i think itd be better cuz my last bass was active A.K.A the musicman stingray 5, i also could get good tones out of a crappy amp:)