• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Split signal, 1 wet, 1 dry, & blend?

I'm looking for a similiar pedal:

A pedal that has 3 outputs, one to clean one to dirty and one to tuner. It would have to have be able to turn each channel on and off. What would you suggest? I am considering just getting a 3 channel loooper and then not using the inputs in it. What do you think?
 
Well Id be using to go:

1. just tuner (silent tuning) (1 output to tuner)
2.clean signal (one output straight to DI, maybe an eq pedal before DI)
3. Dirty signal (going through wah, od,distort. etc. then either DI or through a miked amp (havent quite decided, leaning towards going to the di)
4. Clean with dirty( nice crunchy effected tone with uneffected smooth low end).

So i would be using 1 or channel, or 2 channels at a time. Make sense? ;)
Thanks!
~JB~
 
i had the same problem, well, my problem was i like guitar effects and they dont hold bottom end, and i have two inputs on my amp so this is what i did
RIMG0885.jpg

the clean tone from the seccond output on the behringer sits just behind the effect tone, but i adjust that how much i want by the levels on the seperate pedals, although i would like a boost on my wah...when i upgrade my amp im gonna make a signal joiner box with a blend control
 
I haven't tried this, but couldn't you just put your signal into an ABY box, take one of the outs through your stompbox or whatever and keep the other one clean, then combine them back with a 2-females-into-male cord, then into your amp? Keep the stompbox on all the time, then when you hit the "both" on the ABY box then clean and dirty signals will be sent - and you can just adjust the volume on the effects pedals to match the clean channel. Or am I missing something?
 
Ok, I have in my mind two questions :ninja::
1- ¿is my question the same as the psi's in the opening message of this thread?
2- ¿my question has been responsed?

This come to my mind because of my poor English comprehension. So i'm going to ask my main question in this thread so another useless thread won't be open:

I have a fuzz (Electro-Harmonix Double Muff, i'm kind of happy with it, despite the lost of low end) and I want to split the bass signal so one goes through the fuzz and the other goes directly to the amp, with no effects (is not for cover Harrison's/Beatles' Think For Yourself, but you can think of it as an example of what I'm trying to do, but whit no channel separation, all through one amp and one cab).
The Boss LS-2 might do that?
If somebody has already answered this question could you be a bit more especific because a couldn't understand if so :rollno:.

Thanks in advance.
 
Basically, I'm looking to split the signal from the effects send on my amp head into, say, line A and line B; then put all the effects on line A; keep line B clean; and then blend A and B together before going back into the effects return.

Im pretty sure a VBjr from barge or the LS-2 would be the smallest and most elegant solution.

For the barge: FX send->VBjr input, and VBjr output->FX return. Stick all your FX from "line A" in the loop, turn it on and adjust the knob

For the boss: FX send->LS-2 input, and LS-2 output->FX return. Send "A"->line A->return "A". Connect send "B" to return "B" directly using a small patch cable. Adjust the blend with the "A" and "B" knobs while the unit is in "A+B mix" mode.
 
My response covers fleita's question too

Line A = Fuzz in his case

VBjr: bass->VBjr->amp, stick Fuzz in loop, turn on, adjust knob (can you tell I love this pedal ;))

LS-2: bass->LS-2->amp. Send A->Fuzz->return A. Send B->return B using just a small patch cable. Adjust mix with A and B knobs while mode is "A+B mix"

Feel free to add the following steps:

- ????
- Profit!

And yes, im basically covering my ass cus I never look at post dates LOL :( :ninja: :hiding: