• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Squier Contemporary Jazz V: No Love?

Dr. Cheese

Supporting Member
Mar 3, 2004
57,319
120,608
Metro St. Louis


It seems like these basses just are not very popular, but besides being heavy, I think they are very nice. The neck is wide and fairly thin front to back with 19mm spacing at the bridge. The electronics are two band, boast only with a passive tone control (sound familiar?) The one thing the electronics do not have that I wish they did is an active bypass function of some sort. The pickups are apparently hum canceling, but they certainly get a fine Jazz tone to my ears. At $499, I think they are really underrated.
 
Last edited:
I love mine . I put a 3 band Audere preamp in it and love it even more . Hardware and pickups are really good . It is taking me some time to get used to playing it because it seem kind of big compared to my Sire and Talman but it's a keeper for me . It sounds different than my other basses and it's always good to have options . Mine is eleven pounds .

20201230_130633.jpg
 
My Squier VM Jazz V weighs 11 lbs, and is so comfortable and easy to play. I wouldn’t mind one of these, though I’m not to keen on the soap-bar sound, really. I’d most likely drop some BigSplits in there and call it a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Other than beginning to work on the fret edges this bass has managed to keep a stable neck with no need of adjustment after hanging in the shop more than two years. I think it plays and sounds great. It sounds very like a Jazz Bass despite the humbucking soap bar pickups. It is a big bass like a Roscoe Beck Fender or a Carvin SB5000. I can definitely tell the size when I am holding it.
 


It seems like these basses just are not very popular, and besides being heavy, I think they are very nice. The neck is wide and fairly thin front to back with 19mm spacing at the bridge. The electronics are two band, boast only with a passive tone control (sound familiar?) The one thing the electronics do not have that I wish they did is an active bypass function of some sort. The pickups are apparently hum canceling, but they certainly get a fine Jazz tone to my ears. At $499, I think they are really underrated.

I like the sound you're getting here. I Left a note at YT.
 
Man I can't believe you flipped that Spectorcore already...please let me know what store you traded it at! I think I might want it, if they will ship
I had second thoughts about the Spectorcore before I brought it home. It is a nice bass. I just think that fretted fives make more sense for me as main players. My fretless fours are enough. The bass is at Swing City Music, Collinsville Illinois, about 12 miles from St. Louis, MO.
 
DSCF4087.JPG


I bought this one last Fall (hell, I actually stole it; a mint demo, with warranty cards, and the nice Fender gig bag behind it from Chicago Musical Exchange, for just a little over $400) and have definitely enjoyed it way more than what I paid for it.

It is a bass for a full-grown man. Size-wise, it's a bit bigger than their passive Jazz Fives. Beneath that flawless piano-black paint is a real Ash body, and with that big all-maple neck, mine also nudges a bit over 10 lbs. Not annoyingly heavy, but I know it's there. If you've ever handled a Roscoe Beck Five, it's just like that, the way if feels strapped on.

The 'smoked' hardware (along the lines of that 'Cosmo Black' chrome that Ibanez uses) is just fine, the usual open-gear tuners, a nice bridge. So far, I can provoke no noise from the pickups and electronics. Very easy to live with. It took a slight tweak to nail the action for me, and I've not yet had to revisit it again. Frets and nut just fine. Satin-finish neck and fingerboard, flatter fingerboard radius.

I was quite ready that a 'Squier with active electronics?!?' might be a bit wonky sounding, but as Dr. C has found out, it's full of nothing but great tones. Front pickup gets beefier, back pickup can get that bubble-up dancing tuba tone, it's all good. The add-only bass and treble is handy to thicken up or thin out the tone as it changes when you pan here or there between the two pickups. Single 9v. I'd say the tone(s) are better than average and it's hard to dial up something stupid, and it's quick to find a happy spot without much work.

I'd have to say this is the biggest surprise in a five-string I ever bought. My top five basses over my days were all three versions of the Yamaha BB5000 and two Alembic fives. If they were still around, this would be a very worthy little brother to those beasts, it's that good. I also owned several Peavey Fives and a few others, and this thing would have ate them alive, mercilessly.

I've become convinced over my time with fives (since the late 80's) that a harder, stiffer bass is the way to go to coax those big notes off the big strings, and the ash body and big maple neck kick in big time on this one.

To me, for someone looking for a five with a 'modern' tone folder and the slightly bigger and heavier dimensions are not an issue, this is simply the biggest sleeper out there. Period. It is simply quite an exceptional value and a wonderful bass.

Obviously, I agree with the remarkable Dr. Cheese, once again proof that great minds DO think alike !
 
Last edited: