TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Heathkit? That's among the worst headstock designs I've ever seen. The angle of the D string from the nut to the tuning peg is a nightmare waiting to happen.Hello. Does anyone know the brand name of this bass guitar?
I agree. It appears not much forethought went into how the strings would line up with the tuners.Heathkit? That's among the worst headstock designs I've ever seen. The angle of the D string from the nut to the tuning peg is a nightmare waiting to happen.
Is this bass yours? If so, where did you find it? Any trouble keeping it in tune?
Pee JayJayJackRay Transgression Pee Bass
Correct.Is this not a legit Stingray? Says so right on the headstock. The front looks right
Thank you. That might be a good solution indeed. The history is in the mist unfortunately.It's definitely one of those basses I wish could tell me its life story. Something about that logo seems familiar.
Would an appropriately shaped string tree take some of that sideways strain off the nut?
Seems like there’s enough room to cram a three-fer in there to redirect the A, D, and G. I’d try that, if I cared enough.It's definitely one of those basses I wish could tell me its life story. Something about that logo seems familiar.
Would an appropriately shaped string tree take some of that sideways strain off the nut?
Would match the hardware, too.A less complicated approach would be to use a brass nut. Lateral pressure shouldn't really be an issue, then.
Although, honestly, if the nut on there looks good, I'd just as well leave it alone. It's held up fine.