Honestly I'm not going so far as to tell you what you hear.I was only (first) pointing out that what sounds compressed to one person can sound hi-fi to the next person, and vice-versa. And then (second) saying that using an example of excessive compression as a benchmark for what compression sounds like is not actually constructive. I'd be willing to bet that nearly all of your favorite hi-fi recordings used some compression, but they don't "sound compressed". That's all I was getting at.
I can dig that but if a tone or recording doesn't overtly exhibit the defining qualities of a particular term, how can that term possibly be used to describe that tone or recording. If "it" is so subtle that you can't hear it, then "it" is an inadequte descriptor at best.