• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stingray popularity decline?

For crying' out loud, Dude! It's a bass not a piece of modern art!!!! Who CARES what the opinions are about headstock graphics?!?! The bass 'looks' and sounds different than anything else available....then AND now! That's as far as 'most' players are gonna think that kind of thing through.

If branding doesn’t make sense to you I’m perfectly good with that. Some people who are graphically inclined as well as being players do notice those sorts of things. As do a lot of people which is why so much research and money gets expended on creating an image for a product. If you’re totally immune to that siren call more power to you. Most people aren’t. Even those who sometimes think they are. :)
 
Those were good times, after a 20 year absence I'm back in Florida so I'll need to go check him out again.


I'm no doubt in the minority on this, but I've never liked the slap tone of a Stingray. For me, the quintessential slap tone is the Marcus Miller (i.e. Fender Jazz with pre) tone. When I think of the Stingray, I think of Denman, Palladino, Edwards and other great fingerstyle players who got that thick meaty yet still tight and defined sound. The slap tone of a Ray always seemed....obnoxious to me. Of course, I know there's not many folks who agree with me on that.
.............and on that last comment you would be correct, Sir. Ever listen to Louis Johnson's line on M.J.'s "Get On The Floor"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lowdownthump
That is a wild
I wanted a classic 2 band Ray, but with more creature comfort, and a narrower neck, so I cobbled together this J-Ray. Nordstrand Pickup, with a Mojotone Clone pre. I'm not claiming it's a perfect Ray, but it has that Ray snarl and punch in much more comfortable form. I added a passive tone for the 4th knob.
View attachment 3099164
Wow that is one nice bastardized bass. I like it , you get the sweetness and feel of the neck and the kickass MM sound. Well done, did you have to shim the pocket or did it just fit in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: savofenno
Thanks. The parts are Warmoth. I may have shimmed the neck with a little masking tape. The neck came off another build, and that build got another neck. I don't remember which got which in terms of shim.Side to side, it's a very tight fit.
 
sofa2b.jpg


My first Stingray was in 1978. I had no idea what was to come. I thought it was an odd thing, not much like a P or a J or even a Ric, which I had been playing a lot back then. Or a Kramer DMZ6000B, which I paid way too much for but what else is new.


So I feel like I have some perspective on Stingrays since that was, gulp, forty years ago. Of course, I’m not goofy enough to argue with your opinions. Stuff like, “I don’t like them” is fair enough albeit a tad on the ‘short on information’ side. There are lots of basses I don’t much care for, but you know what I do when someone posts a thread about how they DO like those basses? You already know, don’t you?

Maybe it’s like my mama used to say. “If you can’t say something nice…” but then she was long gone before the internet really exploded with subject matter experts. Really, I can’t imagine taking the time to respond to a thread about a bass I don’t really care for – or maybe just one I don’t know much about.

So it goes.

The neck thing. The baseball bat comparisons. This makes me wonder how much experience a person has with an actual baseball bat. Some of the earlier Stingrays (pre-EB) had some big old chunky necks. The radius was different, the necks were way rounder, and you can still have that experience with a vintage (50s) Precision or a decent reproduction. I have a Dirnt P with a neck like that. But I’ve never had a modern era Stingray with a clubby neck. Wide? Yeah, I guess. Wider than a Jazz bass, surely, except for the SLO versions. But not round like a bat. Nope. Maybe my big old gnarly hands make such business easier to ignore? But I have bursitis, too, so thin necks make it worse for me. Prolly a technique thing, too, but I can hardly even play 6 string guitars these days. Getting old is not for sissies.

The overt zingy nature of the original Stingray was due in part to the fact that Leo was going stone deaf and of course the first freqs to go are the high ones. Heck, even Strats are pretty zingy – go figure. Leo, since he wasn’t a player and couldn’t hear diddly-squat, liked to put a screwdriver against the bridge and have people put the blunt end of the screwdriver in their ears so they could hear the fabulous zing he was getting. Someone posted a photo of Leo and Louis Johnson here, and Leo was doing exactly that with him. Sterling was a beta tester for Leo with the Stingray and told him over and over that it was just too zingy, which is why Leo built him the original Old Smoothie Stingray. To shut him up, surely, haha! But if you have one of those basses and like it, blame Sterling for haranguing Leo about the Stingray electronics being too high-freq forward.


I assume a lot of you old guys know these things, but maybe the whippersnapperrs don’t.


It seems like common sense to me that if a bass you like ergonomically and so forth is too zingy, you might try switching strings. I was an early proponent of Stingrays with flats, and I clearly remember how many TBers thought I was a heretic. A lot of folks said stuff like, “You neutered it!” But I’m not a slapper/popper guy, so what I was getting with flats was exactly what I’d always wanted a bass to sound like. I was so unhappy with string choices in the 80s. Flats saved my life. (Not really, but close.)


For me, “presence” was always about mids. If Stingrays had been mid-shy, I would not have kept playing them. Again, strings and how you EQ the bass itself (not to mention amps and cabs) can make or break your mids. So your experience may be that Stingrays lack mids….I won’t argue with you, but can say that if that had been my experience, I’d be a Reverend endorser or something.

(Which would not suck, mind you.)

I’m really excited about the new, improved Stingrays because I liked the new improved models from Music Man. Bongos? Yeah, there’s your mids, kiddos. Same with the Big Als (RIP). I loved those basses so much that I kind of fell off the Stingray truck for a while there. I’m looking forward to climbing back on. I’m still keeping my Bongos and Big Als and no one is getting my Caprice or Cutlass, but really looking forward to rocking a Stingray again.

Scott B said earlier here that bass sales in general were down a bit, and that included of course the Stingray. I find that sad, even if some of those sales were basses I personally don’t care much for. I myself can’t get my two boys interested in playing. I blame Simon Cowell, hah. I sure hope things improve, even for the lesser known brands like Fender. Hah.


Anyway, that’s my two cents, and it’s worth exactly as much as you paid for it.


Rock on, brothers in bass.
 
I'm a big StingRay fan (can't afford one, plus I can't really play a 43 mm nut, so I happily settled on a SBMM Ray34CA). But I must say that the new specials for 2018 seem like they had the soul of a SR taken away - at least for me. I always thought of a SR as this heavy-duty, a-real-players-kind-of bass (if that makes sense), both sonically AND physically. It was the humbucker, the bridge, the tuners, and the sound all had this .. mass to it. Seeing the SRs now with the slimmed up bridge, the tiny tuners, I know weight is a big factor, but it doesn't seem like a StingRay to me somehow ... Well that's just my 2c.
 
Well, I'll take the lighter weight of it any day. From all the reviews, tuners are nice and solid. The bridge is not that far off. The humbucker is still there (and no silly staggered pole pieces on the 4H!).

But it's still got that manly 41.3 mm nut, which is, you know, what actually makes it a man's bass, a real-player's-kind-of bass, ya know, a real neck, not a pencil :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: bovinehost
I'm a big StingRay fan (can't afford one, plus I can't really play a 43 mm nut, so I happily settled on a SBMM Ray34CA). But I must say that the new specials for 2018 seem like they had the soul of a SR taken away - at least for me. I always thought of a SR as this heavy-duty, a-real-players-kind-of bass (if that makes sense), both sonically AND physically. It was the humbucker, the bridge, the tuners, and the sound all had this .. mass to it. Seeing the SRs now with the slimmed up bridge, the tiny tuners, I know weight is a big factor, but it doesn't seem like a StingRay to me somehow ... Well that's just my 2c.

But yet you are ok with a fake Ray. We see so much of this on here, “I love it, can’t afford it, but I wouldn’t buy it even if I could.”
 
Last edited:
I wanted a classic 2 band Ray, but with more creature comfort, and a narrower neck, so I cobbled together this J-Ray. Nordstrand Pickup, with a Mojotone Clone pre. I'm not claiming it's a perfect Ray, but it has that Ray snarl and punch in much more comfortable form. I added a passive tone for the 4th knob.
View attachment 3099164

Nice bass; beautiful finish!
 
But yet you are ok with a fake Ray. We see so much of this on here, “I like love it, can’t afford it, but I wouldn’t buy it even if I could.”
We're reaching levels of elitism that shouldn't be possible.

Why would I buy something I can't use effectively? Buy is not the right word here though since I already bought it, an American SUB and the Ray34 - and I'm not gonna address the whole fake Ray thing. I didn't keep them because the 43mm nut was too wide for me and was causing me pain. So, yes I can't afford a real SR and if I could I wouldn't buy one because playing it causes me pain, does that mean I can't be a fan of the instrument? Does it mean I can't post in threads like these?
 
We're reaching levels of elitism that shouldn't be possible.

Why would I buy something I can't use effectively? Buy is not the right word here though since I already bought it, an American SUB and the Ray34 - and I'm not gonna address the whole fake Ray thing. I didn't keep them because the 43mm nut was too wide for me and was causing me pain. So, yes I can't afford a real SR and if I could I wouldn't buy one because playing it causes me pain, does that mean I can't be a fan of the instrument? Does it mean I can't post in threads like these?


I can relate. Louis Johnson, Bernard Edwards, Allen McGreir, Paul S. Denman, John Deacon, and Nate Watts are all 2Band StingRay players I grew up listening to that inspired me to play bass. That vintage StingRay tone is one of my favorites. I briefly owned a USA Sub.
But it was very uncomfortable for me to play . If it doesn’t feel good I can’t play it well and I can’t enjoy it.
Now I play a Caprice that fits and sounds just right for me.
I’ll never own a StingRay, but I sure do enjoy listening to others playing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wmmj
I'm a big StingRay fan (can't afford one, plus I can't really play a 43 mm nut, so I happily settled on a SBMM Ray34CA). But I must say that the new specials for 2018 seem like they had the soul of a SR taken away - at least for me. I always thought of a SR as this heavy-duty, a-real-players-kind-of bass (if that makes sense), both sonically AND physically. It was the humbucker, the bridge, the tuners, and the sound all had this .. mass to it. Seeing the SRs now with the slimmed up bridge, the tiny tuners, I know weight is a big factor, but it doesn't seem like a StingRay to me somehow ... Well that's just my 2c.

To me, it seems like Sterling Ball and crew FINALLY started listening to modern bass players, and the Special knocks it out of the park. For years, Ball would kind of chuckle when bassists asked about lighter weight. He just wasn't interested. Its not like lightweight tuners and aluminum bridges haven't been out there for 30 years or anything......

Mine's arriving tomorrow. I'm really looking forward to this one.
 
Sounds like one of the old SLO Stingrays would be perfect for you (1.5" nut). Used ones could pop up as a good deal.
Found out about them like 3 days ago. But I live in central Europe so chances are close to none. But I'm all fine with my fake actually.

And just to add, I'm sure that all the changes they made with the Specials are great improvements. I've been following EBMM for a couple of years now and what I like about them is that they always kept the SR design pretty much the same, and I know that people usually need something new and different so they came up with the Caprice and Cutlass (and Bongo a while back), but seeing them "shaving off" of the SR just doesn't rub me right way. It's just not my style is all. I'm not here to start an argument, just wondering if any one else feels the same way about the new specials.