• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass string lengths questioned

dfp

dfp

Sep 28, 2004
1,548
1,156
USA
#1
what is the effect of shortening the vibrating length of strings on a bass, say one or one and a half inches... other than making the strings looser to achieve the same pitches as before, that is... is there a loss of power or projection or percussion? does anyone have a "shortened" string length on a bass that is "normal" size, like 3/4 or even bigger? i guess this would have to involve shortening the neck, so as to keep the bridge in the proper location...

just curious, b/c it seems like the standard string length in use is based on a model which depended on low tension, high diameter gut strings, but most people now use relatively high tension, low diameter steel... wondering what the modern luthiers think on this topic, thanks in advance if anyone wants to share! -dave
 
#2
hey KSB, no point, and don't worry Jim, i "WON'T DO IT", even though i wasn't asking whether or not anyone thinks i should, it was just a theoretical question i'd been wondering about... wondering about string lengths and what correlations there might be to loose or tight feeling basses...

also, i wasn't so much intending to open a discussion of altering existing basses, but changing the dimensions of the "model" to make a new bass with a shorter string length... wondering why modern makers stick with 41.5 or 42 inches... what do you lose if you make that same bass with 40 inches vibrating length? that kind of question... sorry if i failed to be clear...
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back