FACT: we have a good number of P&W bassists, on this board; people who perhaps subscribe to a view that Scripture is literal truth, or worse, are selective, in what parts of Scripture that they may view as literal truth, or allegory, or metaphor.
My point was to point out the hypocrisy and inconsistency by having people examine their own conscience (and thus, avoid the need for mod intervention). Many otherwise good-hearted people get downright Westboro Baptist-like, when it comes to the condemnation of LGBTs, yet eat shellfish, and have body art. So, just what parts of Leviticus should be taken seriously, or is the whole book not worthy of consideration? I am thus pointing out the hypocrisy of selective interpretation, at the very least. Non-literalists and free-thinkers will realize that I point out something even larger than that, but I have really tried to limit the scope, and potential for offensiveness, by maintaining a high degree of ambiguity, in my posts. It is probably best to leave the subject alone, upon reading this.