• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

svt-450?

Love most all things Ampeg, but not a fan of the 450. Had to use a B2R (same as the 450 except rackmountable) on one of my gigs in Mass last weekend, and I made it work but I didn't really care for it too much. Was very relieved when they brought in an SVT 4 Pro for the next gig.

I think you're better off with a PF500. It's a much better sounding head IMHO, and while the wattage boost is kind of insignificant with the PF500, 500w is all your cab will take before it starts farting out anyway. You have to remember that the 410HLF, because of its crazy low end response, will take more wattage to get to the same volume levels as a more "normal" cab.
 
Ended up getting an ACOUSTIC b600h. I like it so far. I can run another cab too since it goes to 2 ohms. Works well with the sansamp bass driver too. Although still dialing in a good sound with this Sterling Sting Ray Bass. So used to the J-bass sound. Nothing else sounds quite right to my ears.
Love most all things Ampeg, but not a fan of the 450. Had to use a B2R (same as the 450 except rackmountable) on one of my gigs in Mass last weekend, and I made it work but I didn't really care for it too much. Was very relieved when they brought in an SVT 4 Pro for the next gig.

I think you're better off with a PF500. It's a much better sounding head IMHO, and while the wattage boost is kind of insignificant with the PF500, 500w is all your cab will take before it starts farting out anyway. You have to remember that the 410HLF, because of its crazy low end response, will take more wattage to get to the same volume levels as a more "normal" cab.