TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So that means that replacing a tube on both sides of the svt would actually just have the effect of throwing both sides of the amp off of being matched and causing the OP to end up needing to buy 6 new tubes rather than just 3.
I do understand that disclaimer about the amp tech bit, but i am trying to glean as much knowledge about the subject as possible and it's discussions like these that help me along the way. I'm just not the kind of guy that is willing to take my gear to a tech unless I'm absolution certain i can't take care of it myself. Thanks a lot for your insight.
I do understand that disclaimer about the amp tech bit, but i am trying to glean as much knowledge about the subject as possible and it's discussions like these that help me along the way. I'm just not the kind of guy that is willing to take my gear to a tech unless I'm absolutely certain i can't take care of it myself. Thanks a lot for your insight.
I do understand that disclaimer ...
For the record in any of the tube SVTs there is no such thing as a pair. bias is adjusted, in most, by adjusting one side and then the other. If a single tube goes down you need to match a tube to the others on that side and adjust the bias appropriately. If you cannot match then you NEED to replace the triple on that side and redo the bias to suit.
Also for the record I went to engineer school when tubes were current technology and transistors were a science that would never last!!![]()
But what about matching tube transconductance?
Matching tubes for cathode current at the working plate voltage AND matching transconductance between tubes is important.
Thanks very much! But this statement implies to me that cathode feedback doesn't significantly affect dependence on device gm. So I'm wondering why doesn't the cathode feedback make gain independent (or significantly less dependent) upon device transconductance? Or is there something else going on?
Thanks very much! But this statement implies to me that cathode feedback doesn't significantly affect dependence on device gm. So I'm wondering why doesn't the cathode feedback make gain independent (or significantly less dependent) upon device transconductance? Or is there something else going on?
Geez Guys!! My heads too old for all this thinkering and trying to remember stuff!!![]()
It doesn't half hurt does this sort of stuff. I can do with a cuppa.
Randy, your post about pairs above ignores what happens when three differing tubes are on each side. one of the tubes will pass more current than the other two in the triple. It does more work. That means that it will wear more than the others. In extreme cases it will blow first if driven too hard. That puts you right back at the point this thread started: one dead tube. Do yourself a favour and think triples not pairs. As I said earlier, there is no such thing as a pair in an SVT.