• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SVT vs. V6: Market feedback request

First off, both amps have their strengths and weaknesses. For mostly fingerstyle rock (I don't ever use a pick), I would prefer a SVT, but if I am doing anything else I would use a V6. I appreciate both tones, and would want both if possible (maybe a 2 channel amp or something).
hasbeen said:
Other input would be helpful:
* Does the weight stop you from considering an all-tube amp?
* Would you be more or less likely to buy a tube amp if it had a more "modern" or "versatile" preamp then these two?
* If these two aren't "your" tube amp, what is? Eden, Aggie?

Thanks a bunch in advance.
Kindest Regards,
Roger Hart
I have an all tube amp, and while less weight definately helps I would take a 200 lb head if it sounded good enough.
There is a lack of modern, reasonably priced hi fi sounding tube heads since Trace stopped making em. The Mesa 400+ gets this market somewhat, but I would not really consider it hi fi in the same sense as a TE. One market that doesn't really have any competition yet is the market for dual channel preamps, such as I mentioned above. I would definately consider one of those (if it were in the same price range as the Mesa and CL and Orange head)!
I use a Mesa 400+ and its very versitle, but again it doesn't do the hi fi thing like a TE. I like the 400+ a lot though, being pretty versitle in tonal possibilities. I liked the Eden tube head for the great overdriven tones though, and a nice pre through an Aggie or Demeter power amp would be awesome, but way too expensive.
 
Phyrexian said:
Great thread. I never compared my V8 to an SVT.
Keep it comin' tough.

Ow yeah:
V8 = 400 watt (8x KT88)
V6 = 300 watt (6x ??)

The V6 has 6 KT88 powervalves. Watts is a bit unsure, on the bac kof mine it says 400, but in reality its probably less, more like 350 to 380. Someone stated hat the pre amp is a bit useless, i think not. It's just how i like it, simple yet effective, and passive, meaning that the tone pots are interactive. Two good things about that: very easy to find a good sound, and impossible to get a bad sound. The Bass (cuts mids), Bright and Mid Boost are very effective. Is it the same pre amp as the V8?

I'll take some pics soon.

Groetjes
 
All an amp manufacturer has to do is come up with a 40lb or less amp that sounds and "feels" like a cranked vintage SVT at resonable volume with some modern accesibility and they would own the market. Then having a clear channel that you could blend with.... that would be awsome too.

If you build it they will come.

To comment on the Motorcycle comparison:
Indian Motorcycles came before Harley and were more popular untill after WWII. There are people who would only buy Indian. Where were these people when Indian started making bikes again?
POINT- Sometimes you need to reinvent the wheel in order to evolve.