Yes, you do.Using this logic you have the same problem going from IV to I.
G-D, G-D, C-G, C-G, G-D, G-D, D-A, D-A.
In that example, the bass notes faintly imply that the G chord is half a bar earlier than it is. Just as when going from the I chord to the V chord, if you play G-D, D-A, there's an implication that you've gone to the D chord half a bar early.
Is this a hard and fast rule? Of course not. But there are a lot of alternative things to play when going from I to V (or from IV back to I) that don't do this. One that I use a fair amount of the time is the whole step above, so for I chord to V chord it'd be G-E, D-A. Could go from IV to I as C-A, G-D. And so on.
What I try to avoid is doing the stereotyped quarter note walkup for every chord change; it avoids the two repeated notes and the implied early chord change, but when the bass player does it constantly it's like screaming "CHORD CHANGE NOWWWW!!!!" throughout the whole song. And then if the guitar player is doing the same pattern, it really sounds hokey.
There are dozens of ways to skin this particular cat. And it's not all that unusual to go ahead and play the proscribed G-D, D-A, too. I'll often find myself doing that when I'm not paying the closest attention, or when the tune is new to me. "Oh, it's a V now!" I mean, it's not actually WRONG like playing G-D, Gb-Bb would be.
