TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I tried out the 410 and the 115 cab with the 600 head and I personally thought the 410 was a louder cab, and could go equally deep and it was also punchier than the 15" cab IMO...Peace...DAcat![]()
Run the Effects Send or balanced Direct Out (both post-EQ) into the power amp input.Would anyone know how to configure the B200H as pre-amp EQ only into a 2 channel power amp (like a QSC, Crown, Yorkville etc.)?
Run the Effects Send or balanced Direct Out (both post-EQ) into the power amp input.
The effects send/preamp out signal will be the same whether or not cabinet(s) are connected to the speaker output(s) of the head. You're just grabbing the line level preamp out and routing it to an external amp. With this head, all the front panel controls are before the preamp out in the signal path, so eq, notch, gain and volume, and the rear panel D.I. out volume, will function as usual. The D.I. out level can get pretty hot when turned up IME. It's really up to you as to how you want to balance the volume of the preamp with your power amp. The thing I'd watch for is running the preamp too hot could cause clipping in the input of the power amp.
BTW, I have the actual circuit schematics from Acoustic, which show that the signal path in the block diagram in the manual is correct.
The D.I. out level can get pretty hot when turned up IME.
I'm not clear on what this means. Do I keep the volume up on the power amp and control it with the Acoustic?
Yes
Go out of the effects out on the Acoustic into your poweramp.
Turn power amp all the way up. Use the Acoustic to control your volume. You'll have to play with the gain and volume on the Acoustic depending on how much distortion you want. This will give you the most headroom on your poweramp. You can go out of the D.I. as stated but it has a seperate volume control for attentuation, for those pa and recording boards that don't have there own attenuator or its not enough. Use it liberally untll you find the right mix without clipping.
Try them both but I'd use the effects out which is really the same as a line out. Now if your poweramp is going to be a long distance from the Acoustic then use the D.I.
Experiment.
Yes
Go out of the effects out on the Acoustic into your poweramp.
Turn power amp all the way up. Use the Acoustic to control your volume. You'll have to play with the gain and volume on the Acoustic depending on how much distortion you want. This will give you the most headroom on your poweramp. You can go out of the D.I. as stated but it has a seperate volume control for attentuation, for those pa and recording boards that don't have there own attenuator or its not enough. Use it liberally untll you find the right mix without clipping.
Try them both but I'd use the effects out which is really the same as a line out. Now if your poweramp is going to be a long distance from the Acoustic then use the D.I.
Experiment.
Another benefit with this method is that if the effects out does the job & drives your external poweramp well enough (wouldn't see why not - aside from the long-distance factor), then this will still keep your DI output free to send your signal to a PA system on a gig, if necessary/applicable.
The power amp would sit right under the Acoustic one, so distance won't be an issue.
The only reason I'm even doing this is because I lucked into a pair of Bag End cabs, but the 2x10 is 4 ohms, the 1x18 is 8 ohms. I can't run them together from the Acoustic, so I've been told it would work with a 2 channel power amp (that can do 8, 4 and 2 ohms) with the Acoustic driving it.
Another suggestion was to use my Sansamp DI pedal into the power amp, but I prefer the B200H as I really like the tones I get from it.
I assume the power amp will be transparent as far as tone goes?
I see - yeah, the only feasible way of driving all those cabs with those kind of ohms ratings would be to do the external poweramp route like that or upgrade to the B600H. The SansAmp through the poweramp would work, but would not give you the Acoustic tone. In fact, the Acoustic head is the first bass head I've ever tried that I didn't feel like a SansAmp actually enhanced. That, I was really unprepared for (in a good way).I think another TB'er poster said something to that effect in this thread somewhere, at first I was skeptical, but I find it to be true too. Spent a ton of time tweaking and A/B'ing with the SansAmp on/off & I'll be darned if I didn't like the Acoustic better un-SansAmp'ed - lol. But still, it is an option I suppose - if ran by itself through a poweramp.
The reason I'm not jumping on the B600H head is that I belive the 2x10 4ohm cab will draw more wattage than the 1x18 8 ohm cab, and thus be louder. With the 2 channel power amp I believe I can control the sound into both cabs and balance it out.
I've tried my Sansamp pedal into the B200H, it's alright, but doesn't impress me the way I thought it would from what I'd read. I've found maybe 2 settings I can live with.
I play the B200H into the 4 ohm 2x10 all the time and it sounds really good. I'm hoping the 1x18 will round out the sound (bottom end) a bit more with the 2x10.
Good point - as I discovered between my 4-ohm Schroeder cab & the 8-ohm B115, the volume balance was not quite equal - good, but not totally equal. However, the 18 you've got might move just enough air to compete against the 4-ohm 210 (ohmage aside). Never know till you try I suppose - a lot of experimentation in your future me thinks.Hope it works out.
Maybe Acoustic's tech support could shed some light...