• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Backfire Effect

SgtHulka

Inactive
Mar 29, 2019
2,165
5,095
Banland
The Misconception: When your beliefs are challenged with facts, you alter your opinions and incorporate the new information into your thinking.

The Truth: When your deepest convictions are challenged by contradictory evidence, your beliefs get stronger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bholder
The Misconception: When your beliefs are challenged with facts, you alter your opinions and incorporate the new information into your thinking.

The Truth: When your deepest convictions are challenged by contradictory evidence, your beliefs get stronger.
A lot of people seem to prefer “feeling good” to honesty and truth. If the truth is likely to get in the way of their feeling good then defensiveness (and sometimes doubling down on the belief being challenged) is likely to ensue.
 
Or cognitive dissonance.
AFAICT, cognitive dissonance is part of the "why" of this effect: people resolve it by doubling down.

I swear the LCD mindset boils down to avoidance of mental discomfort, including that of simply thinking about stuff instead of just reacting to it.
(LCD = Least Common Denominator, for those for whom it's an unfamiliar term)

Then again, my opinions should always be taken with a grain of salt. I just figured out I'm most likely somewhere on the Autism spectrum, which would explain a lot about me not thinking quite the same way most people do.
 
The Misconception: When your beliefs are challenged with facts, you alter your opinions and incorporate the new information into your thinking.

The Truth: When your deepest convictions are challenged by contradictory evidence, your beliefs get stronger.

I'm very fortunate. I seem to be going in reverse of most people. The older I get the more open minded I become. I love learning new things. And I love paradox shifts in my own life

That being said, let's look at this from two angles. You already presented the angle of the person receiving the "facts". The problem is, there is so much information out there about pretty much everything these days that the person PRESENTING the "facts" could also be a zealot for his/her cause who is blinded by his/her belief system.

In short, who gets to decide what is a "fact"? We won't delve into any potentially troublesome issues here. But you could put me on a debate team, give me either side of an issue, and I could go into the interwebz and find you hours of "facts" to back up my side and destroy yours. I could find research from prestigious universities that backs up both sides of the argument. I could find you experts who are well respected on both sides and show you hours of interviews.

I've been on a nutrition journey for a couple of years now. I listen to audio books and podcasts on health/well being/nutrition pretty much all day at work.... hours per week. In one podcast you'll have on a guy who has studied vitamin C, and nothing else, for decades. He'll swear we should be taking 20 times the recommended daily allowance and that he'sbeen doing it for years. He'll give you a list of benefits that will make you swear vitamin C is the fountain of youth. Shoot over to another podcast, and another guy, whose credentials equal the last guy, will swear that if you take that much vitamin C he can list for you the systems in your body that you're destroying. He'll tell you all about the negative consequences of such actions.

In short, "facts" usually include an agenda these days. People are trying to sell books, establish a brand, get interviews on notable shows of all kinds, sell products that will make your life better, win an election, save the planet, etc.

We could spend all day on the question "What is a fact?"
 
I have a disagreement with the majority of the human species about the fundamental nature of reality. Evidence unfortunately doesn’t always change people’s minds, not when you’re told something as a child before you had the cognitive ability to understand it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: equill
I have a disagreement with the majority of the human species about the fundamental nature of reality. Evidence unfortunately doesn’t always change people’s minds, not when you’re told something as a child before you had the cognitive ability to understand it.
You are a lizard. Some disagreements with the majority of the human species is to be expected.
 
Cool subject. Never knew there was a known aspect of psychology called Backfire Effect. I see it, or something related, in action by far too many folk in real-life or online. It's got my interest and will be reading more on occasion. Thanks for the homework assignment, @SgtHulka LOL.

Found this along the way. A comic of the Backfire Effect inspired from a Podcast called "You Are Not So Smart".:
You're not going to believe what I'm about to tell you - The Oatmeal
 
Last edited:

Latest posts