Oh, yes, for sure... but that does mean you need to practice it to the point you can execute it effortlessly and without thinking about it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh, yes, for sure... but that does mean you need to practice it to the point you can execute it effortlessly and without thinking about it.
Which is why it's the bread-and-butter of bass playing... everything else is there for extra flexibility for the times you need that. Yes, pivoting is good for speed, but my contention is that it is also more stable than open-hand, and works in the low positions as well.
Well, since I'm a classical player, I'll have to say that I don't quite know how it works out for Jazz, especially for pizz tone. However, for my own playing, pivoting is distinctly better than shifting for both intonation and flexibility, despite my having 20-something more years of experience in basic Simandl technique (I learned to play in the mid 80s, and have only been seriously working on pivot-style technique in the last few years).
Add below-the-octave thumb position, and it's night and day when things get complicated. Of course, standard hand shape is where you default when you don't need the extra speed, you wouldn't stay in a pivoted position for more than a small fraction of a second unless you're immediately going to pivot back again.
Sorry to always be the spelling troll here, but is it possible you mean Dr. Mark Morton?......I have talk alot with Dr, Mark Martin about some of these problem I am finding with my playing. I will be investing in his method,......
... I don't think any method reccomends 1234 all over the bass, anyway.