• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Modified BEAD 4 String Bass Club

If I had money to spare, I'd wouldn't mind one of these for BEAD
2E1A1342_800x.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rafar, lomo and CC7
Did some reading on B strings on TB and thought I'd summarise some conclusions regarding Tension, Feel and sound.
1. Tension . This is basically set in stone. If you want a greater tension you can
a/ increase the string unit weight
b/ increase the scale length
c/ increase the pitch.
Obviously option C is ruled out if tuning BEAD. Option B requires no comment. Option A does not necessarily mean an increase in gauge. Eg A rotosound 77 .110 is the same gauge as a Chrome .110 but has more lbf. Obviously differences in how the greater unit weight is achieved given the same gauge is involved.

2. Feeling .
a/ String stiffness
Is the string stiffer without any tension applied. Larger and or higher tensile core. Material around the core beneath windings, round core/hex core, flexibility
b/ bass construction variables given the same scale length. Neck thickness, head stock design ( fender type or back angled) to name a couple of things

3/ Sound
a/ heavy or light touch
b/ pickup placement, type, height

c/ manipulation via eq, effects, sound delivery ie cabs/ speakers/ headphones. Active/passive

d/ Sustain
i/string gauge, type and tension.
ii/The top loading vs string thru argument.
iii/Neck attachment method argument.

d/Timbre. Expression and arrangement of the harmonics. This is a mix of bass construction and string choices.

Think that about covers it.

If I have missed some aspects of what or what doesn't result in a good B or have some stuff wrong, please add or correct

I can't change my basses at the moment for a longer scale length for B. I plan on trying a more lbf string like a Roto 77 .130. The necks on my basses are pretty thick. Both fender style headstocks. I have tried a spacer, and didn't notice any difference in string feel. I will try getting the string winding down as far as possible on the post for a greater break angle at the nut. For now it's C#EAD for me which is where the B strings I have on feel the best for both my basses. Equivalent of having the .132 Chrome tuned to B0 at a 36" scale length. The .128 La Bella on my other bass would be B0 at a 38" scale length
 
Last edited:
Did some reading on B strings on TB and thought I'd summarise some conclusions regarding Tension, Feel and sound.
1. Tension . This is basically set in stone. If you want a greater tension you can
a/ increase the string unit weight
b/ increase the scale length
c/ increase the pitch.
Obviously option C is ruled out if tuning BEAD. Option B requires no comment. Option A does not necessarily mean an increase in gauge. Eg A rotosound 77 .110 is the same gauge as a Chrome .110 but has more lbf. Obviously differences in how the greater unit weight is achieved given the same gauge is involved.

2. Feeling .
a/ String stiffness
Is the string stiffer without any tension applied. Larger and or higher tensile core. Material around the core beneath windings, round core/hex core, flexibility
b/ bass construction variables given the same scale length. Neck thickness, head stock design ( fender type or back angled) to name a couple of things

3/ Sound
a/ heavy or light touch
b/ pickup placement, type, height

c/ manipulation via eq, effects, sound delivery ie cabs/ speakers/ headphones. Active/passive

d/ Sustain
i/string gauge, type and tension.
ii/The top loading vs string thru argument.
iii/Neck attachment method argument.

d/Timbre. Expression and arrangement of the harmonics. This is a mix of bass construction and string choices.

Think that about covers it.

If I have missed some aspects of what or what doesn't result in a good B or have some stuff wrong, please add or correct

I can't change my basses at the moment for a longer scale length for B. I plan on trying a more lbf string like a Roto 77 .130. The necks on my basses are pretty thick. Both fender style headstocks. I have tried a spacer, and didn't notice any difference in string feel. I will try getting the string winding down as far as possible on the post for a greater break angle at the nut. For now it's C#EAD for me which is where the B strings I have on feel the best for both my basses. Equivalent of having the .132 Chrome tuned to B0 at a 36" scale length. The .128 La Bella on my other bass would be B0 at a 38" scale length


Proddy, I've added a link to these Conclusions on the BEAD 4 String Bass Wiki page, at the bottom of the How-To section. :thumbsup:
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris_H60
Been hanging onto this 1969 body like grim death and saving to go to a local guitar building workshop to make a 35" scale maple neck for it. A one hundred track long trip hop/rock writing project has been crying out for the low B. Having scratch-built around a dozen 34" Fender shape basses I'm not scared, but man am I hanging to get the spare cash to do it. A mortgage has really put the brakes on all the fun stuff...

68 body.jpg
 
I am finding myself interested in having a B, but not in having a 5-string.
I have also found that my broken old hands really like the short scale of a 30" bass.
I also have the original full-scale Sterling 4HH I bought as my first bass before finding short scales. I have not gotten rid of that for some reason or another.

If I were to make the Sterling into a BEAD machine, then just play the EADG 5 frets up unless I need the drop tuning, would that be similar to playing a short scale?
Or would I really be messing my brain up?
Or would my hand/brain want to go be using the open strings?
In which case, I would be back in the long scale hurts my hands issue?

Partly wondering if I could put that Sterling to use somehow rather than switching one of my 30"ers to BEAD
 
Or would I really be messing my brain up?
Or would my hand/brain want to go be using the open strings?
In which case, I would be back in the long scale hurts my hands issue?
Can't speak to your hands. I can tell you I found it harder to go to BEAD than to start on the 5. Could be because older me has a less malleable brain. Or because it's easier to slip into old habits without the extra string to constantly remind me.

It's got to be worth a try. Worst that could happen is you need to replace your filed out nut to go back to standard tuning. Which might not even be necessary if no buzz or rattle happens going back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HoHumbucker
I would agree with Factory Presets, but might add that your markers will be off (if you use them) if you are playing EADG on the 5th fret with a capo. Also, I would think that it might feel even shorter than your short scale.

but like was mentioned… not much harm in trying it out
 
I would agree with Factory Presets, but might add that your markers will be off (if you use them) if you are playing EADG on the 5th fret with a capo. Also, I would think that it might feel even shorter than your short scale.

but like was mentioned… not much harm in trying it out
I had not thought about the fret markers being off. But, yeah, that would be a thing.
 
I am finding myself interested in having a B, but not in having a 5-string.
I have also found that my broken old hands really like the short scale of a 30" bass.
I also have the original full-scale Sterling 4HH I bought as my first bass before finding short scales. I have not gotten rid of that for some reason or another.

If I were to make the Sterling into a BEAD machine, then just play the EADG 5 frets up unless I need the drop tuning, would that be similar to playing a short scale?
Or would I really be messing my brain up?
Or would my hand/brain want to go be using the open strings?
In which case, I would be back in the long scale hurts my hands issue?

Partly wondering if I could put that Sterling to use somehow rather than switching one of my 30"ers to BEAD
If you capo'd a long scale at the 5 th fret in BEAD tuning it would be the equivalent of a sub short scale 25.5" tuned to EADG. You would have to tune up to DGCF on the long scale and capo the second fret to get the equivalent of a 30" short scale in EADG.
 
Last edited:
Hi BEADers!

I bought a Guild Starfire II and it arrived on Friday. After putting it through it's paces with the stock strings this weekend, I went to change them for my favored LaBella LTFs tonight and the nut popped off. I restrung it and it's fine. But it got me wondering where I can find a pre-cut 38mm nut for BEAD. I have a set of Dunlop 40-120 flats on the way and I've been going back and forth on whether I want to convert the Guild or my Mustang. If I can find a drop in replacement, converting the Guild seems like the easy option.

Your thoughts appreciated. Thanks!
 
Hi BEADers!

I bought a Guild Starfire II and it arrived on Friday. After putting it through it's paces with the stock strings this weekend, I went to change them for my favored LaBella LTFs tonight and the nut popped off. I restrung it and it's fine. But it got me wondering where I can find a pre-cut 38mm nut for BEAD. I have a set of Dunlop 40-120 flats on the way and I've been going back and forth on whether I want to convert the Guild or my Mustang. If I can find a drop in replacement, converting the Guild seems like the easy option.

Your thoughts appreciated. Thanks!
Something like this might work. Roller for the E string looks wide

Invalid Link Removed
S7b134f99fcc54e119a6b4cb7adb7c2ba9.jpg_640x640Q90.jpg_.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HelpImaRock
I couldn't adjust, so now all my 4-string basses are in BEAD.


Welcome a new Club number! :woot:

#104 @Britsie

;) I'm getting there, too, Brit! My top three basses are all BEAD. :cool:

I'll be monitoring to add more members as they post here. If I skipped anyone, please let me know. There's still a few numbers left for even more members! :smug:

And, you can find the entire BEAD Membership list on the BEAD Club Wiki page. :thumbsup:
.