• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Official Reeves Bass Amp Thread

tombowlus - after my little experiment with the presence control the other day, I understand that sentence in your review of the C225 about how sweet the highs can be when dialed in!

jphilauren - that bass has got to sound killer through that rig!!! I had John Kallas build my version of a Fenderbird with a pair of '63 Thunderbuckers. It turned out cool and sounded killer. I enjoyed playing down memory lane (used to own a '63 series II Thunderbird) for a while but sold it because it was just too rock and roll for the praise music I do these days.

KenHsq-jag-14.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: tombowlus
I have been experiencing some annoying noise and distortion when playing certain notes. Wasn't sure at first if it was the amp or speaker. Switched to the normal input and everything was clean and punchy. Went to TCtubes.com (what a 'candy' store!) and snagged a nice Telefunken to replace the Sylvania in V1 that was apparently half-bad. Hey, life is short... :cool:
 
I only really appreciated how difficult it is to build a uniform quality preamp tube after reading the story of the
guys who tried and failed to revive the original U.K. Mullard plant.
So many people were hoping they would succeed, but test after test, no matter how hard they tried, the tubes were microphonic.
 
Invalid Link Removed

A link to an article on the Mullard restart. I think their problem was more related to the radical design change than anything else. Still, the glory days are long gone. The big companies and wealthy investors are no longer willing to invest in R&D, tooling and training for a small market. All in all I think it is pretty amazing that we have any new tube manufacturing going on. While there are some good new tubes being made, IMO they are not great, and I started buying NOS preamp tubes several years ago when I saw prices starting to accelerate. I am sure glad that I did.
 
I grabbed two matched quads of SED Winged C EL34's before prices went nuts.
Tough as nails compared to JJ's or Sovtek, but now after production stopped Wing'd C prices are near
NOS. Might as well buy Mil Spec Siemens
 
I've just been spending some quality time finger picking my precision and playing with EQ. If you're playing a passive bass, don't be afraid to crank the mids, treble, and presence. The favorite settings tonight: bass @ 10:00, mid @ 5:00, treble & presence @ 3:00. Tone to make you drool drool drool
 
I've just been spending some quality time finger picking my precision and playing with EQ. If you're playing a passive bass, don't be afraid to crank the mids, treble, and presence. The favorite settings tonight: bass @ 10:00, mid @ 5:00, treble & presence @ 3:00. Tone to make you drool drool drool

That gets too clanky, too much on top for my taste. When you crank the mids, you get a lot of high mids.
 
I am seriously considering shelling out the cash for a Reeves 225. My only concern is whether the amp will be loud enough for my needs. My tone concept is pretty clean with lots of headroom (as opposed to preamp cranked overdriven tone). I know that published specs are pretty meaningless, so I wonder if anyone has ever compared the Reeves 225 to a good old SVT for volume purposes. Also, I currently have a Mesa Boogie Strategy (which I love) and an mPulse 600 (which I also love). Can anyone compare the Reeves to either of those (again, for volume purposes). Lastly, can anyone compare the Reeves to either the Strategy or Prodigy as far as tone goes?

If it matters for your advice and comments, I play in a medium-loud bar band. I don't usually run through the PA, and I've got to keep up with 2 guitar players... one Marshall 5 watt, and one Fender Twin.

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eidolon0274