• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Pros seem to favor mixed cabs

It's just a fact that in a mixed rig the smaller speaker will strain to keep up with the larger one, unless you're biamping, or doing something to even them out. Or unless they're mixed within the same cab and designed to work that way. For small-time guys like me matching cabs is the way.
 
It's just a fact that in a mixed rig the smaller speaker will strain to keep up with the larger one, unless you're biamping, or doing something to even them out. Or unless they're mixed within the same cab and designed to work that way. For small-time guys like me matching cabs is the way.

+1 in that is the simpler, more predictable way to go for most.
 
One should also remember that many top notch 'famous' bassists are totally, utterly clueless about gear. They either don't care, or just haven't focused on it. Nothing wrong with that!

Zero correlation among 'skill on the instrument', 'popularity/success of the player (in general)' and 'knowledge about the technical issues involving sound reinforcement' IMO and many years of IME.

Also, as posted above, the larger/higher end the venue, the less important backline becomes. Most are going direct into front of house, and have massive, high quality monitor support with their own mix (or in ears).

Exactly right. And I'll add that there are plenty of great musicians using absolutely NON-state-of-the-art gear because they can't afford the cutting edge stuff, even if they did spend the time reading Bass Player or following TB, to stay up to date. Often when reading TB, I can't believe how many hobbyists there are who get rid of their month-old gear because something with more bells & whistles has come out.
:hiding:
 
One should also remember that many top notch 'famous' bassists are totally, utterly clueless about gear. They either don't care, or just haven't focused on it. Nothing wrong with that!

Zero correlation among 'skill on the instrument', 'popularity/success of the player (in general)' and 'knowledge about the technical issues involving sound reinforcement' IMO and many years of IME.

Also, as posted above, the larger/higher end the venue, the less important backline becomes. Most are going direct into front of house, and have massive, high quality monitor support with their own mix (or in ears).

+1
 
I like to tailor my stage rig by the venue. (and if I'm going to the FOH)
If a mixed cab set up will work, then it works.
If a 4004 into a 4x10 will work, then it works.
If I have to use a 1x15 100w tiltback facing back at me, then it works.
Whatever I have to do to keep the venue owner and bandmates happy, and most importantly preserve my tone.
Like to keep it flexible, options open.
Of course, that means you HAVE to know what the venue situation is.
Had times where I brought an indoor rig to find out we're outside, or the other way around.
Those times I [DEL]throw a hissy fit[/DEL] take a deep breath and soldier on.
 
I saw Willie Weeks playing with Eric Clapton a few years ago. It was an arena outside Atlanta that holds about 10,000 or so. Maybe more. Weeks had a single small Aguilar cabinet and amp. Clapton had one or two small Fender combos. Everybody was wearing inner ear monitors.

About halfway through the first song, the entire PA system went out. All you could hear was this tiny sound coming from the amps on the stage. Everybody in the audience is murmuring, and almost drowned out the amps. After 45 seconds or so, when Clapton just started singing the third verse the PA roared back on and everybody went nuts screaming an applauding. Clapton was startled- he evidently had no idea why everybody started applauding, and probably had no idea that the entire PA had gone out for a bit.

I think Clapton's amps were mic'd. Can't remember about Week's.
 
The pros are publicly seen to be favoring what the largest manufacturers are selling. Gee, how novel.....just like running shoes ;-)

You mean the magic bass cab and the magic running shoes were just ordinary junk and not magical at all? All I needed was the confidence to get up there and win? The magic was in me? You mean the tone really is in my fingers? :eek:

You evil bastards lied to me! :mad::spit:
 
You mean the magic bass cab and the magic running shoes were just ordinary junk and not magical at all? All I needed was the confidence to get up there and win? The magic was in me? You mean the tone really is in my fingers? :eek:

You evil bastards lied to me! :mad::spit:

You can WIN on your own.....but you can't impress your TV-watching neighbors, LOL.
 
If you want to check out the peak of bass amplification.... I mean some of the newest highest tech on it check out this YouTube video of Mike Gordon. He explains the problem with his old 4x18 n some 15s n some 4x10s, and what he has moved to and why. Omits really cool.

Invalid Link Removed

Check it out.

Rob

An American saying 'bugger' sounds weird to me, is it not a word used there much?
 
One should also remember that many top notch 'famous' bassists are totally, utterly clueless about gear. They either don't care, or just haven't focused on it. Nothing wrong with that!

Zero correlation among 'skill on the instrument', 'popularity/success of the player (in general)' and 'knowledge about the technical issues involving sound reinforcement' IMO and many years of IME.

I agree. When I was on the road I took a modulus bass that I had used for years and a Warwick as a backup. Taylor gave me an acoustic bass for radio performances. I took whatever amp I got an endorsement with (mesa boogie ) and I used in ears for monitoring.

I let the tech and our FOH guy set up my amp however they wanted and then I decided if I liked the tone. If I did not, I could easily communicate the frequencies to change or anything else.

Don't get me wrong, there is always a tone that I want and I got it how I wanted. But I never thought much about it since I could get it dialed in 1 rehearsal, and as a result I believe it actually helped me define my sound better. I spent all my time working on technique and never really worried about gear too much.

I come here and it is wild to read about stuff like dead notes..neck dive..mixed cabs..I simply never thought about any of it. I played a major showcase through a carvin 15 and a hartke 4x10 and it sounded fine. It was not that expensive and it worked for me when I needed it.

This is a nice resource to have when you are looking for a new guitar or piece of gear, but I would stress that many people may be over thinking the gear aspect way too much.
 
I agree. When I was on the road I took a modulus bass that I had used for years and a Warwick as a backup. Taylor gave me an acoustic bass for radio performances. I took whatever amp I got an endorsement with (mesa boogie ) and I used in ears for monitoring.

I let the tech and our FOH guy set up my amp however they wanted and then I decided if I liked the tone. If I did not, I could easily communicate the frequencies to change or anything else.

Don't get me wrong, there is always a tone that I want and I got it how I wanted. But I never thought much about it since I could get it dialed in 1 rehearsal, and as a result I believe it actually helped me define my sound better. I spent all my time working on technique and never really worried about gear too much.

I come here and it is wild to read about stuff like dead notes..neck dive..mixed cabs..I simply never thought about any of it. I played a major showcase through a carvin 15 and a hartke 4x10 and it sounded fine. It was not that expensive and it worked for me when I needed it.

This is a nice resource to have when you are looking for a new guitar or piece of gear, but I would stress that many people may be over thinking the gear aspect way too much.

I agree. I do thank TB for learning about all the latest gear/techniques/etc, but before I came on here, I didnt think about most of the stuff people post about. I could play pretty well though and thats what I concentrated on.
 
I really don't care what other bass players do, and neither should you. Some will match cabs, some won't...in the end, you need to do what is best for you.

Lots of good thoughts here, but Jimmy nailed it. It's safer to use identical cabs, but you can get great results with mix'n'match.

I've shared this a lot, but: I once had a pair of 2x10 cabs. One was an Ampeg (rear ported, I think), the other was an EV-loaded Mesa/Boogie with front port. Both had tweeters. The Ampeg was all about the punch (even the tweeter didn't go all that high), the Mesa was definitely 'hi fi', deep and clear. In short, the stack sounded much better than each individually.

I also once ran a 2x10/1x18 rig that sounded killer.

On the downside, I tried some mixed rigs that definitely did not work. So... if you want to keep it simple, find one cab that works for you and add a 2nd just like it if you need more volume. Or, get a tall cab that you like.