• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

The Real Reason Why Bands Play the Same Old Tired Covers

To come back to this debate- I remember my old band spent all this time trying to get two "New" songs down a couple of years ago- These songs were "Bad Girlfriend" and "Porn Star Dancing"-
Guess what?
Nobody remembers or wants to hear EITHER of these songs now.
We wasted HOURS trying to get these two songs to sound right (the second one has all kinds of stupid studio effects on it) the first is a rip-off of EVERY cult song ever.
What a waste.

:laugh: We actually had a request for "Porn Star Dancing" once - from a girl :eyebrow: "Bad Girlfriend" is pretty popular with some cover bands around here - note I didn't say it was popular with the audience...
 
  • Like
Reactions: obimark and Pacman
What is this "dark side" you speak of? DJ? Would that not be a different thread? ;)
Yeah. This thread is pretty much about the kind of crap that finally drove me to start DJing.

We even get to play a ton of classics which bands avoid. Join the dark side. We can touch this. We are the ones who let the dogs out.

Seriously, I think it makes me nicer and easier to get along with as a bandmate. If no one else wants to do "Shake It Off" or "Muevelo", that's fine - I play them all the time anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petrus61
To come back to this debate- I remember my old band spent all this time trying to get two "New" songs down a couple of years ago- These songs were "Bad Girlfriend" and "Porn Star Dancing"-
Guess what?
Nobody remembers or wants to hear EITHER of these songs now.
We wasted HOURS trying to get these two songs to sound right (the second one has all kinds of stupid studio effects on it) the first is a rip-off of EVERY cult song ever.
What a waste.

To tell the truth, I had never heard of either song either. I looked up porn star dancing and it peaked on the Billboard charts at #90. It doesn't seem like a tune many people would have heard on a regular basis, unless maybe they hang around strip clubs or something.

I think the issue you get at is deciding how much effort any song is worth going to. I think you need to decide to add a song either because a) it's a very popular song that will go over well, or b) it's an obscure but awesome song that the band can "sell" even if it's not well known. With us, the big debate lately was whether to add All About that Bass. Singer really wanted to, guitar really didn't, drummer and I didn't care. It's obviously a really popular tune, but we also agreed that it's going to hit its expiration date pretty quickly and people will get sick of it. However, the tune is so easy we could throw it together without even really bothering to rehearse it (did so in about 5 minutes at our last practice), so what the hey - we're doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: obimark
We all are from different geographical and economical backgrounds. All of our audiences are different as well. To comment on what works 3 states away is ignorant at the very least.

At the end of the day we are all chefs preparing our own dishes. If your audience has more refined tastes, you play that. If your audience likes chicken and wings, you serve that. The moment you leave your house and request payment for your services, you should always keep that in mind. The customer is always right. Play Fates Warning and Dream Theatre in your basement if you like, but play what sells if your concerned about getting paid and asked back. Just my 2 cents.
 
"Bad Girlfriend" is pretty popular with some cover bands around here - note I didn't say it was popular with the audience...

That goes for the entirety of one band's "drop D mini set. Ask me how I know ;-)
 
At the end of the day it comes down to risk-reward (as does most of life)-
What is your expected pay-off for the time put in to do something. If learning a "current" song is simple, and can be accomplished with minimum fuss, and goes over well. The risk-reward is good.
If the "current" song is very difficult to learn, has instrumentation that the typical bass,vocals, guitar, drums band doesn't have and requires too much prep and work and only has a slim chance of going over then the Risk may be too great for many.
So, bands that bet on the same old tired, stuff are basically "hedging" their bets, that enough people still want to hear it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winfred
Songs like that are fun to play. Locked out of Heaven also calls for.switching from muted clean a la Sting to synth bass and back.
I never had anyone complain about synth bass being played without any synth.

Yeah, I had a guy offer me $100 to do Pantera at a country gig a few weeks ago. While I could have done it, the rest of the crowd would've hated it, and we'd probably have gotten fired. Which is exactly what I told the guy.
Couldn't you countrify a Metallica number and keep everyone happy?
 
Now we're getting somewhere....the emergence of the " Updated Modified Cover " band.

It's not whether you play Mustang Sally....it's how you play it and what you do with it that counts.....

How about a speed metal version with a slight lyric change? Swap out "ride sally ride" for "DIE Sally DIE!" :roflmao:
 
Now we're getting somewhere....the emergence of the " Updated Modified Cover " band.

It's not whether you play Mustang Sally....it's how you play it and what you do with it that counts.....

One of my groups (the one without a chick singer) actually DOES do Mustang Sally. It's not a crazy metal or ska version or anything, but we speed it up and change the beat and generally don't sound much like we're pretending to be Wilson Pickett. Goes over great.
 

Latest posts