• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

They changed my sound. Is it good?

scottfeldstein

scottfeldstein

Roots and fifths and a little extra.
Jun 20, 2011
6,544
4,412
57
San Marcos, California
endlessblue.bandcamp.com
#1
I put down some scratch tracks a couple of weeks ago in my band's rehearsal space and was surprised at how great it sounded. When I got sent a mixdown, however, I was surprised yet again at what had been done to the sound I had.

I'm afraid I can't give you a "before," but I can describe it in relation to the "after."

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Notice the soft, fuzzy clipping kind of sound? That wasn't there. All that I heard before was new ProSteel strings and a hint of grit/modeling from my very modestly dialed-in SansAmp BDDI. The before was big, growly and aggressive--but not the slightest bit fuzzy as it is now.

The knob-twister dude mumbled something about having added some "SVT." I think he was inspired by the sight of my SansAmp and figured I would like it or something.

Anyway. I'm trying to decide if I like it or hate it or if I want to suggest something different to him or what. This guy's going to be engineering my bass sound on two upcoming albums.

What do you folks think? Like the sound?
 
#4
scottfeldstein said:
Anyway. I'm trying to decide if I like it or hate it or if I want to suggest something different to him or what. This guy's going to be engineering my bass sound on two upcoming albums.
Click to expand...

What really matters is how you feel about it. If it was me (and I was paying for it) I wouldn't suggest, I'd tell him to put it back the way it was.

One of my pet peeves is these knob twisting nit-wits (who I am paying) that think they can just change my sound because they don't like. I appreciate suggestions, because I'm paying for their expertise, but don't just do it behind my back.

If I'm paying the bills, I'm making the decisions.
 
#7
I agree with what you said. Too 'gritty' for my taste. And I think the signal is clipping. +1 to telling the engineer to fix it. You're paying him -- make it sound like you want.
 
#8
lfmn16 said:
What really matters is how you feel about it. If it was me (and I was paying for it) I wouldn't suggest, I'd tell him to put it back the way it was.

One of my pet peeves is these knob twisting nit-wits (who I am paying) that think they can just change my sound because they don't like. I appreciate suggestions, because I'm paying for their expertise, but don't just do it behind my back.

If I'm paying the bills, I'm making the decisions.
Click to expand...

You're quite right. Upon reflection, I think that I do like it--for this particular track. I love the sound I get right now straight out of my DI, but I think his creative instinct--to muddy this one up a bit--is one that I can get behind.

Also, this isn't someone I've hired. This is my guitar player, synth/drum programmer. Clever guy, actually, and a terrific musician. But we've just started working together a few weeks ago, so I'm getting used to the way he does things and vice versa.
 
#14
lfmn16 said:
What really matters is how you feel about it. If it was me (and I was paying for it) I wouldn't suggest, I'd tell him to put it back the way it was.

One of my pet peeves is these knob twisting nit-wits (who I am paying) that think they can just change my sound because they don't like. I appreciate suggestions, because I'm paying for their expertise, but don't just do it behind my back.

If I'm paying the bills, I'm making the decisions.
Click to expand...

I totally agree with this, Scott. Although I like the tone in the recording a lot, you must decide if that tone represents your style and your whole idea of how a bass guitar should sound. Assuming, of course, that the result is a whole lot different than what you expected. I mean, minor tweaks and suggestions are welcome in means of respect to the experience and wisdom of the engineer, but a totally different approach should definitely be discussed if you are not convinced about it.
 
#16
Alvaro Martín Gómez A.;12025960 said:
I totally agree with this, Scott. Although I like the tone in the recording a lot, you must decide if that tone represents your style and your whole idea of how a bass guitar should sound.
Click to expand...
I disagree. Digging your feet into the ground and halting the progress on the rest of the project in order to insist upon your own tone goal is one way to go, but in my experience the downside outweighs the upside.

That bass track sounds sick, even if it's not precisely what Scott may have envisioned. Maybe the other guy is right, and it will work well in the final product.

Scott, I'm basing all this opinion on your implication that you don't HATE what you are hearing there; it's just not quite the same as you heard before.
 
#18
If you can't hear it by clicking the link, right-click and choose "Save Link As...", or whatever they call it in your browser.

I like the sound. Would love to hear the "before", so I could compare.

In any case, if you're decided to have your original sound back, explain your vision to him and ask nicely. He's going to be engineering your bass sound on two upcoming albums...
 
#20
WJGreer said:
I'm basing all this opinion on your implication that you don't HATE what you are hearing there; it's just not quite the same as you heard before.
Click to expand...

Quite right. I think it's a pretty cool sound. I was just surprised by it. I wouldn't want that sound full-time, but it's pretty cool.

I think that's the point I need to make sure is clear: cool for that track, not cool all the time.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back