I owned a pair of Modulus Quantum 5 basses, one with barts and the other with EMG. I sold them because string spacing at the bridge was 17mm... my right hand could never get comfortable.
More comments:
Fit and finish were excellent. Both had really pretty quilted maple tops... four A's out of five on my scale. Super-tight neck pocket, smooth curves, gorgeous deep poly finish that brings out the grain of the wood.
Weight, as noted, was on the heavy side. I believe this was due to the alder/maple body... graphite necks are usually hollow and lightweight. Balance was excellent due to the long upper horn.
Nut width was 1-7/8" which was perfect for my fretting hand. I had no problems with deadspots. The graphite neck has a gloss finish, and I prefer satin, but that's not a big deal. Neck profile was on the slim side of medium, I guess. Bottom line is that I'm not crazy about truly slim necks, but my left hand was happy on the Quantum.
Tone was transparent, hi-fi, modern on both basses. The EMG electronics were a little more aggressive. Also, the EMG bass had a parametric midrange control - very cool. The bart bass had a basic 2 band EQ... nice but limited in comparison with EMG (note that some Quantums with barts do have 3 band EQs). Warning about the transparency: the Quantum is an unforgiving bass, technique-wise. But I wouldn't consider that a bad thing. And really, any bass can be warmed up with tubes or tube emulation, tone tweaking, etc.
Finally: the Modulus Quantum has the best B string of any bass I've played. Now... I still haven't played a Dingwall or any other bass with a B string longer than 35". But I've played tons of boutique fivers and the Quantum's B is as good or better (usually better) than all of 'em in terms of sustain and clarity. That applies to all of the strings, actually... the string-to-string balance was amazing.
More comments:
Fit and finish were excellent. Both had really pretty quilted maple tops... four A's out of five on my scale. Super-tight neck pocket, smooth curves, gorgeous deep poly finish that brings out the grain of the wood.
Weight, as noted, was on the heavy side. I believe this was due to the alder/maple body... graphite necks are usually hollow and lightweight. Balance was excellent due to the long upper horn.
Nut width was 1-7/8" which was perfect for my fretting hand. I had no problems with deadspots. The graphite neck has a gloss finish, and I prefer satin, but that's not a big deal. Neck profile was on the slim side of medium, I guess. Bottom line is that I'm not crazy about truly slim necks, but my left hand was happy on the Quantum.
Tone was transparent, hi-fi, modern on both basses. The EMG electronics were a little more aggressive. Also, the EMG bass had a parametric midrange control - very cool. The bart bass had a basic 2 band EQ... nice but limited in comparison with EMG (note that some Quantums with barts do have 3 band EQs). Warning about the transparency: the Quantum is an unforgiving bass, technique-wise. But I wouldn't consider that a bad thing. And really, any bass can be warmed up with tubes or tube emulation, tone tweaking, etc.
Finally: the Modulus Quantum has the best B string of any bass I've played. Now... I still haven't played a Dingwall or any other bass with a B string longer than 35". But I've played tons of boutique fivers and the Quantum's B is as good or better (usually better) than all of 'em in terms of sustain and clarity. That applies to all of the strings, actually... the string-to-string balance was amazing.
), but I'm not hearing that at all. 