• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thinning out a G&L Kiloton body to shave weight

Hi all!

I have a G&L Kiloton Tribute that weighs 4.67kg (10.3lbs). It hurts... I have a G&L SB-2 Tribute that weighs around 4.2kg, with the same body shape and similar hardware (in terms of weight).

Ironically, I expected the Kiloton to be lighter then SB-2 because it's basswood, while SB-2 is Mahogany :(

So, my question is: what do you think about taking the paint off, thinning out (and possibly sculpting) the body a bit, and repainting? I'd try to take the most mass by thinning it out. I think it only makes sense if I take at least 350 grams of. I might then invest in lighter tuners to get another 100ish grams off, for a total of 450 grams.

Now, if the body weighs around 3kg (is this a reasonable assumption?) and I want to take let's say 400 grams off, that's around 13% off. Let's call it 15%. The body is 42mm thick, without the solid paint that might 40mm (I'm assuming this). So I'd need to take 40mm * 0.15 = 6mm. That seems quite a lot... Considering the neck cavity, PU cavity, PU screws etc... It might just not be feasable...

Am I thinking in the wrong direction?
 
My opinion:

Sell it and find a lighter one. By the time you Frankenstein this thing, you may or may not get where you want to be weight-wise, and UNLESS this is done in a very professional way (that is, after you're finished, a stranger would have to really stop and think why this one is lighter and/or different as it looks completely stock), you will be hard-pressed to sell it off at any reasonable return.
 
Great, thanks for your thoughts...

I also really like doing some woodwork, so I like @Roland GR 88 's reply. I'm aware that I'd be lowering the resell value. But, I already converted it to fretless, so I'm more or less married to it :D And I wasn't able to resell it before the conversion (not much demand in Croatia for a G&L Kiloton). Also, I'm happy with the conversion and the fretless sound I get from it. So, it just might become hollowbody :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricky Rioli
What I would do, if it were in my shop:

Rout 1/4" off the back surface of the body. Lay out and rout some large chambers in the back side of the body. Make 4-5 medium size chambers with 1/4" wide walls between them. Place most of the chambers in the forward part of the body. Rout the chambers deep enough that you are leaving only 1/4" top. Then cut and glue on a 1/4" thick back, out of some medium weight wood. Maybe alder, ash, walnut. That construction arrangement will minimize the weight of the body, while keeping the stiffness about the same. It shouldn't affect the tone much.

Then you'll have to work with the balance. Lighter tuners if you can, and you may have to add some metal weights at the back end of the body. I'm guessing you might reduce the overall weight by 700g?
 
What I would do, if it were in my shop:

Rout 1/4" off the back surface of the body. ....

Thanks for these details. I'm thinking it might be better to do it from the front, so I can put on some nice wood on top. As for the tuners, I was already looking into it, and some people are successfully replacing G&L Tribute tuners with Hipshot Ultralights for around 160 gram reductions. I think that, and the very beefy G&L bridge, and your suggestion to take more material off the front neck-end of the body, might be the way to keep balance.
 
Thanks for these details. I'm thinking it might be better to do it from the front, so I can put on some nice wood on top. As for the tuners, I was already looking into it, and some people are successfully replacing G&L Tribute tuners with Hipshot Ultralights for around 160 gram reductions. I think that, and the very beefy G&L bridge, and your suggestion to take more material off the front neck-end of the body, might be the way to keep balance.

Working from the back is better from an engineering viewpoint. While under load, the back surface is under tension, while the top surface is under compression. Putting the thin cap of stronger wood on the back, means you can cut away more of the center wood without losing strength and stiffness. But I understand that most people want to put a cap on the top for decorative reasons.
 
I was surprised too, based on what I've read about basswood. It's a modern precision-style body... Same body shape in mahogany is 450g lighter :/ Maybe the piece is exactly from a branch-point :D

I know diddly-squat about woods, but I do know no basswood bass I ever tried was anything more than average weight. I'd be really interested in an explanation. Perhaps someone on a luthier subforum knows more.

I've just quick googled that the average dry weight of mahogany is 40 lbs/ft3, while that of basswood is 26 lbs/ft3.
 
I know diddly-squat about woods, but I do know no basswood bass I ever tried was anything more than average weight...

Well, if I get around to doing this project, I will weigh the body alone, with and without paint and report. In the meanwhile, no idea... There is 450g extra, compared to the same-shaped SB-2. SB-2 has the same bridge and tuners. Same neck profiles. Both are passive, Kiloton has a mini-switch extra :D SB-2 has a P/J config, the Kiloton a humbucker, which I don't imagine is (much) heavier than the P/J. SB-2 has a maple/maple neck, Kiloton a maple/rosewood, Kiloton is now fretless. Both are solid-painted. Both balance well, Kiloton is dead-set of course, no dive possible. So, maybe a bit of extra weight in the neck due to density differences, but most of the weight difference really must come from the body... Oh yeah, when I took the neck off, the cavity displayed the light color of basswood (my only reference is online materials), so I think that's inline with the spec.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merlo79