Hman said:NO man...not mine..![]()
Sorry man, bad memory. I do have a great pic of this bass when it wasn't broken though. Pretty sure this pic was from NAMM 06. For anyone thats interested...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Hman said:NO man...not mine..![]()
Grey Goose said:Sorry man, bad memory. I do have a great pic of this bass when it wasn't broken though. Pretty sure this pic was from NAMM 06. For anyone thats interested...
Grey Goose said:Sorry man, bad memory. I do have a great pic of this bass when it wasn't broken though. Pretty sure this pic was from NAMM 06. For anyone thats interested...
![]()
![]()
SMASH said:Any ideas how that output jack damage happened?
nonohmic said:Dude thats a sixer.
.Grey Goose said:Ok, so maybe I was trying to fool some people. Im tired, bored, and a little goofy, gimme a break.
puff father said:Katrina survivor? (maybe "survivor" is the wrong word...)
:scowl:
Smallmouth_Bass said:$1400 starting bid for an instrument in that condition?
That is as sad as the state of the instrument!
Mad wife??![]()

nonohmic said:How much different is a bass gonna sound after that much repair?
Surely the original tone can never be recovered.
SMASH said:I do !!!
That seller recently sold two DB750 amps, and due to the seller claiming it "untested as-is" (who can't even test that an amp can work, or at least turn on?) they sold very cheaply. One went to a TBer who seemed to have subsequent problems but it might have been resolved.
Anyway, it is odd to see such rare bass gear go for sale via this oddly named seller. This one takes the cake though.
Any ideas how that output jack damage happened?
