• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Tube Tues…
upload_2022-11-8_8-39-0.jpeg
 
Those weak of heart may want to look away, but my '68 Custom Kraft 34" scale (EADG) hollow-body (with extended string-stop floating bridge) is very long. As long as my '64 T-bird. I got the longest string I could find at the time, and they were still too short. So I pealed back the silk winding and never looked back. Plays great, sounds great, and never had an issue playing it live and in the recording studio. Not "ideal" looking (but disclosing that the silk wrap is a purely cosmetic addition) - functionally, removing it had no effect on the strings ability to produce the required (and quality) sound/tone.

View attachment 4867043
...pic taken right after I got it and before I installed the red-silk flat-wound strings - I'll have to take a current pic of both.
View attachment 4867044




Interesting to see what’s under the silks. Pretty scary looking, but if it works it works! Not sure I’d want to do a slide up to that zero fret. Actually I’ve never played a zero fret, no idea how that works or what it offers.

Just messing around with a new TRC for my black VP
Extra points for anyone that can identify the sticker.
Hint..upper North West folks might have a better shot at recognizing the skeleton dude.
Cheers!
View attachment 4867155
My goodness - he’s gone Rogue!
Bottoms up buddy!
 
I certainly enjoy both pickups on my '64. It adds something you can't get with just one. I use the neck only at times, but mostly both are in play.

Yep - I love my 1 pu basses, but in the case of my II and the '51 P RI, I wanted more tonal variety/options. Like you I always use both pu's and usually favor the bridge pu for enhanced definition. Have the neck pu laying down the beef - the SDHB carries it across the line.

Pic from a few years back - my Pacifica friend Aron did the cool octopus T-shirt I'm wearing. He does nautical/oceanic illustrations and is a high-school teacher. He's also an awesome guitarist/bass-player/bandleader. I've attended a few different manifestations of his ensembles from a bass & drums duo to a 5-piece.
upload_2022-11-8_9-8-12.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yep - I love my 1 pu basses, but in the case of my II and the '51 P RI, I wanted more tonal variety/options. Like you I always use both pu's and usually favor the bridge pu for enhanced definition. Have the neck pu laying down the beef - the SDHB carries it across the line.

Pic from a few years back - my Pacifica friend Aron did the cool octopus T-shirt I'm wearing. He does nautical/oceanic illustrations and is a high-school teacher. He's also an awesome guitarist/bass-player/bandleader. I've attend a few different manifestations of his ensembles from a bass & drums duo to a 5-piece.
View attachment 4867360
Great pic G!..
 
Yep it's all mine, dated Feb '79 one of the last Tele's out the door. I picked it up for a reasonable price about 10 years ago. I call it KS as in everything but the kitchen sink. When I got it it had a 50s style guard and more knobs and switches than I liked so I got a 70s style pg and wired it with two concentric pots so I have four independent volumes. It's a killer bass the neck is amazing.
For those interested I posted a demo of this bass in genpop.
 
Is the neck profile on the non-reverse thunderbird exactly the same as the reversed?

I know the NR is set neck compared to the neck through on the reversed.

I'd consider a non reverse it played and sounded the same.

The necks are different when comparing the Non Reverse and Reverse Thunderbirds, regardless of when they were made, having heard and played both I can hear a difference when I'm playing them - that said, there are a lot of variables to account for, strings, amp, pick, fingers........etc.
 
Crisper, more clarity without loss of punch of any kind.
I'd say they sit somewhere between Lulls and Sidewinders.
Although those pick ups are monsters in their own right.
Interesting. The only Thunderbird I can remember hearing live besides a modern TB+ one is a Bicentennial when I saw Shadowy Men on a Shadowy Planet, which didn't sound like it had much low end, at least how Dallas Good had it tuned. Since you've heard mine live, where would you place it in clarity, crispness, punch, etc., among the Lulls and Lollars and such.
 
Interesting to see what’s under the silks. Pretty scary looking, but if it works it works! Not sure I’d want to do a slide up to that zero fret. Actually I’ve never played a zero fret, no idea how that works or what it offers.


My goodness - he’s gone Rogue!
Bottoms up buddy!

That's it. I was looking at a freshly emptied bottle and thought ...I could do something with that.
 
Is the neck profile on the non-reverse thunderbird exactly the same as the reversed?

I know the NR is set neck compared to the neck through on the reversed.

I'd consider a non reverse it played and sounded the same.
60’s reverse and NRs are closer in neck feel (NRs sounding better imho)….for the later post 2000 models reverse necks are better tapered…..they sound pretty close however….
upload_2022-11-8_9-33-25.jpeg