• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Thunderbird Club

Epiphone made a version also, I have one, plays and sounds awesome. FYI (I posted the question earlier) if I'm correct Gibson made the Studio V 5 string from 2005 - 2007, took the CNC tooling to China and built them there as the Epiphone Pro V (neck through, active) 2009 - 2012 with left overs still available in 2013. The Epi version goes more in the $600 - 700 USD range as opposed to the much pricier Gibson version ($1500 - 1800 USD). Both seem fairly rare but I'm thinking the Epi might be a tad more likely to pop up?
 
Larry, how's the B string on the Gibson?

On my Cherry Studio V it was so-so which I heard they were wont to be and that they were hit and miss. On my Black Studio V it is much more pronounced and extra thumpingly soul shaking. :D

The quickest, cheapest path to a 5 string Thunderbird, IMO would be to go with the Pro V and swap out the P/U's and go passive.
 
Unfortunately lulls cost about $3500 USED in Oz, and no way Im paying that for a bass. Also the headstocks arent reverse.

One day I hope to get a Cataldo, they are much more reasonably priced. Probably not while I'm at uni scrounging around at part time jobs and gettong paid $40 per gig though.

Stick it out at the University, it'll make for many possibilities in your future :thumbsup:
 
image.jpeg
Put a Hipshot GB7 detuner in my '14 Epi Thunderbird Pro IV. I had to file down the tuner hole which I was hesitant to do but it did not take much!
 
The quickest, cheapest path to a 5 string Thunderbird, IMO would be to go with the Pro V and swap out the P/U's and go passive.
I wasn't aware that the pickups were different. I knew the electronics were but thought they both had the T-Bird+ pups. I am aware of the difference in sound but I'm really liking the sound the Pro V makes with the active setup. Whatever the difference IMO it's not a step down, more of a different flavor. Since I mostly play classic rock and variety for a lot of that stuff it's definitely a good fit tone wise.
 
Not even close to the same bass. The Gibson is a set neck, not neck through. The Gibson has a slab body and is passive. The Epi Pro V does not have the Gibson pickups and it's active not passive.

And the Epi Pro-V also has the T-bird trademark raised centerpiece, which the Gibson Studio doesn't.... So apart from the electronics, the Epi Pro-V is actually a lot closer to a Gibson T-bird than Gibson's own 5-string offering (construction-wise that is)... ;)