I agree, I wasn't a fan of the DB659. The AG500 is much clearer, yet still with a warm low end.KB said:I had an Aggie DB659 at one point and found it to be too wooly in the lows. Does the AG500 have this as well?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I agree, I wasn't a fan of the DB659. The AG500 is much clearer, yet still with a warm low end.KB said:I had an Aggie DB659 at one point and found it to be too wooly in the lows. Does the AG500 have this as well?
Mel Monihan said:I have only used the Thunderfunk, and I must say that my search has ended.If there is a better amp out there, I hope I find it someday, and that it doesn't cost more than my first car, but I have stopped looking for it.That's how good I think the Thunderfunk is. Thought you might like to know that there is one on ebay now with a but it now of $595, and an opener of $495.That is a great price on a serious amp.
Point taken, I stand here humiliated and demoralized.Fred Labbidie said:Okay! But this thread is about comparing the two amps! The fact that you can't compare the two, and have no interest in doing so, is at least off the subject!
Fred Labbidie said:Okay! But this thread is about comparing the two amps! The fact that you can't compare the two, and have no interest in doing so, is at least off the subject!
JOME77 said:Some people take themselves to seriously!![]()
Mel Monihan said:I have only used the Thunderfunk, and I must say that my search has ended.If there is a better amp out there, I hope I find it someday, and that it doesn't cost more than my first car, but I have stopped looking for it.That's how good I think the Thunderfunk is. Thought you might like to know that there is one on ebay now with a but it now of $595, and an opener of $495.That is a great price on a serious amp.
jeflepard said:I own the Thunderfunk and it is so good that I don't even think about other amps. It is easy to use and lightweight. It is worth the money.
KB,KB said:The ebay seller is "thunderfunk" . You may try emailing Dave Funk directly on it.
I am still considering the Thunderfunk vs the Aggie. The Thunderfunk is a few hundred $$$ cheaper.
KB said:The ebay seller is "thunderfunk" . You may try emailing Dave Funk directly on it.
I am still considering the Thunderfunk vs the Aggie. The Thunderfunk is a few hundred $$$ cheaper.
Roscoe5 said:I sent two emails to the Ebay seller with the Thunderfunk with no reply. Curious. Things that look too good to be true usually are. When I get no response from an ebay seller, that's the first 'caution' flag. Too bad. would love to check out a Thunderfunk amp. - Gary
Dave_Funk said:
To be fair, the second channel on the AG500 is not intended for a clean sound.JOME77 said:I found it impossible to get a clean/warm sound out of the "Saturated" channel on the AG500. The fact that it doesn't allow you to blend it with the normal channel made it useless IMO (unless you're into an overdrive sound).