TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes - that would be a reasonable assumption. Especially if you can get your hands on a Danelectro or something similar. Note how that guy in the second video is coming up with a very good simulation of the desired sound.So, at the "friends playing tunes in the living room" level, would a four string short scale bass, flatwound strings, all the bass rolled off and all the treble boosted, played with a pick, be a reasonable facsimile? I think I'm going to find myself playing in a situation with another upright player; two uprights ain't gonna cut it. But adding that "click" to the front end might be something of interest.
I'd be willing to put $150 into a used short scale bass and some strings to try it out, but I don't think I would want to put $500+ into one of the six stringers, plus learning how to play it.
So, at the "friends playing tunes in the living room" level, would a four string short scale bass, flatwound strings, all the bass rolled off and all the treble boosted, played with a pick, be a reasonable facsimile? I think I'm going to find myself playing in a situation with another upright player; two uprights ain't gonna cut it. But adding that "click" to the front end might be something of interest.
Yes - but try out the bass first. Some that have humbuckers like Gibsons/Epiphones might have a hard time getting that tone. A Fender/Squier short scale might be a good one to test out for this.If I go out looking for elcheapo used short scale basses, am I right that one with a bridge pickup would help in getting that trebly click?
I agree with everything you say here, but I'm skeptical of how well roundwounds would give the proper simulation since they weren't really in use during the heyday of the tic-tac sounds. I believe that roundwounds would be better for getting that Duane Eddy type of sound.You can use flats if you want, but rounds will get you closer to the original sound. And you don't need to roll off all the bass or boost the treble. Just use the bridge pickup and a pick. You might add some reverb as well. It was common for the Bass VI part to be recorded through a guitar amp.
The real reason for tic tac bass was that the speakers most people used for listening to the radio didn't reproduce bass very well. Not unlike people listening on phones or laptop speakers today. So if you only had upright on a song it couldn't be heard in cars, or if someone was listening on a hand-held transistor radio. By doubling the same notes with a much twangier instrument the bass part would be audible.
Producers could also effectively EQ the bass by mixing in more or less of the upright and VI tracks. And compress them separately. Exactly like people still do today by mixing a DI with a mic'd speaker track.
I agree with everything you say here, but I'm skeptical of how well roundwounds would give the proper simulation since they weren't really in use during the heyday of the tic-tac sounds. I believe that roundwounds would be better for getting that Duane Eddy type of sound.
It's hard to determine when Danelectro switched to installing stock roundwound strings as stated in the famous John Entwistle story regarding the recording of "My Generation", but I do believe the original UB-2 (mid 1950's) may have used flats:Rounds were the normal strings used on Dano 4 and 6 string basses and Fender Bass VI's. That's part of why they were used instead of long scale 4 strings prior to 1966.



