• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Total Cell Phone Ban While Driving?

This makes very little sense.
Being that I would be a part of that same society those laws would also be there to protect me.

Laws help protect those who live near or around those with poor judgement. If everyone had good judgement we wouldn't need laws.

Or, in other words, I don't care if you want to participate in risky behavior. But if that behavior puts others at risk, it then becomes a concern. Or, if you want to drive and talk on your phone and end up in the hospital or morgue, I don't care. If you hurt me, someone I love, or another innocent person who just happens to be there, I care.
 
Well, the odds were better that they would have had distracting passengers.

You are one unlucky dude, my sympathies. I'd think yours is probably a rare exception in the world or rear-enders. No offense, but I couldn't use your rare experience as a litmus test for all cell phone users.

They actually had no passengers. Just paying attention to the phone instead of the traffic in front of them. Yeah, I'm unlucky but given the prevalence of people using their phones while driving around here, it's almost inevitable.

I've been a passenger at times with drivers talking on their phones. They think they drive perfectly well when they're on the phone, too. :rolleyes:
 
Laws help protect those who live near or around those with poor judgement. If everyone had good judgement we wouldn't need laws.

Or, in other words, I don't care if you want to participate in risky behavior. But if that behavior puts others at risk, it then becomes a concern. Or, if you want to drive and talk on your phone and end up in the hospital or morgue, I don't care. If you hurt me, someone I love, or another innocent person who just happens to be there, I care.

You might as well say people driving puts people at risk. Ban driving.
 
They actually had no passengers. Just paying attention to the phone instead of the traffic in front of them. Yeah, I'm unlucky but given the prevalence of people using their phones while driving around here, it's almost inevitable.

It was a hypothetical using the stats from an early post.

I've been a passenger at times with drivers talking on their phones. They think they drive perfectly well when they're on the phone, too. :rolleyes:

I can't speak for them, only myself. If they are driving that poorly while talking on their cell, I have two questions:

Do you ever tell them they are unsafe drivers?

Why do you become a passenger in their unsafe vehicle?
 
THen someone is going to have to remove all those billboards on the side of the freeway!
I dont think the state is too keen on spending the cash to do that.

Right. What are we going to do, appoint a Driving Distracted Czar to the president's cabinet? Where does banning distractions end?

The people who need to "ban distractions" are the individuals who find themselves distracted, not Big Brother.
 
I can't speak for them, only myself. If they are driving that poorly while talking on their cell, I have two questions:

Do you ever tell them they are unsafe drivers?

Yes. That's how I know they believe they actually drive perfectly well while they're on the phone.

Why do you become a passenger in their unsafe vehicle?

It's not their vehicle that's unsafe.
 
You're right. We should live in a completely lawless and unregulated society. No taxes, no rules, no services. None of your 'freedoms' will be infringed upon. ;)

Now we're talking! ;)

But seriously, we've made it this far without cell phone use killing off entire communities, and studies have shown that these kinds of bans do zero, nada, zilch to lower automobile accidents. Why should we willfully allow a law to pass that has already shown to do nothing? What good does it do besides make you pro-ban folks feel better about the road? Do you think all cell phone related accidents are going to suddenly be nonexistent?
 
The 'reasonable' part isn't about the conversation, its the 'driving impaired' part. Feel free to talk on your cell phone, but when you're throwing around a ton or more of steel SUV at 40, 50 or 70mph at the same time, and you're cognitively impaired...

Hey, how'd you know I drive a Suburban?

If you see me hitting one button on my cell phone and making a hands-free, voice-activated call that poses no greater distraction than a billboard as "cognitively impaired," I can't help you there.

But I think many "reasonable" people would disagree. It really feels like a stretch to me.
 
As indifferent to billboards as I am, are they that distracting?

Id say no more or less than any other possible distraction on the road. Especially the new LED ones I see popping up here and there. Theyre only calling for the attention of the drivers on the road. In fact, I believe I remember an attempt to ban or regulate them at some point, possibly in the 90s, but I could be wrong.