How mandatory is it for the members of a tribute band to look just like the people they are honoring? I mean physical appearance, not just style. I ask because some people are rather unique. I dare you to try and find a competent bassist that looks like Geddy Lee, or a vocalist who both looks and sounds like Steve Tyler.
On that note, how similar does the vocalist need to sound to the original to be taken seriously? Does he/she need to be precise, or is just being a good singer who nails the material enough?
everyone has their opinions here, but I'm IN a very popular tribute band for 3 years now. We have bookings where we are flown places and have made up to $5,000 for playing 2 hours. We are in demand so I guess whatever we are doing, we are doing it right.
http://highwaytohellrocks.com
Do we look PERFECT? no, but we definitely take it as far as we can. It seems to work.
Yes, successful tributes get the sound AND the look. You MUST have the sound. Definitely. But once you have that, getting the look, the stage and the "act" down definitely will set you apart from other similar tributes. People like it. They expect it.
Having the look but not the sound? You wont' get far. You really need both.
That being said, you also have to do the RIGHT tribute. I see people doing band tributes that just don't have wide appeal. Queensryche? Radiohead? Nine Inch Nails? Even Sabbath to a degree. You're only going to get so far with tributes that do a band that itself has limited appeal. Gotta be marketable. For some of those bands, I'm not sure anyone really cares if they cop the "look".
oh and I've seen a band that does a decent job sounding like Rush...and yeah the bassist sings and does it well, and plays the keyboards, etc. they do a great job. I was impressed when I saw them. Very very tight sound. The look? So so...but for a band like Rush, the sound is key. They are called "Rush Hour"
We are with an agent that has a bunch of bands that do the look pretty well.
http://www.maximumbands.com/rushour.html