I am almost hesitant to ask because I don’t want to open a can of worms. And this is going to be very long winded, thank you to all who will be reading this. Maybe I am thinking out loud, literally this has been on my mind all week.
Up front I’m a “professional” drummer and drum teacher, whatever that means. I think it just means I pay a lot of taxes and don’t work a 9-5. As a bassist, I play at a larger church that uses IEM, play in student bands, and the occasional small cover band gig.
For a year I’ve used a Two Notes bass revolt, it’s fantastic. I sold it to get a GX100 which I tried for a month and sold it to buy, well another revolt. Sometime the last few weeks I purchased a Carl Martin bass drive, and traded my MISO for a Broughton Mini Fridge DI.
Side note, I sold the revolt the first time because it was extremely functional and almost stale since it worked so well, but after I sold it, I realized how important that it was to “my sound”.
Here’s my dilemma. I don’t want a large board, I don’t want redundancy, and I don’t want to have effects sitting in my closet.
I want a board that “leans” toward CCM but I am also aware that the sound now may not be the sound in 5-10 years, so versatility is preferred.
The board I imagine for that would be tuner-two notes revolt- FX out to HX stomp (which I don’t have) and out.
What I have currently in my collection is a revolt, Carl Martin drive, tuner, mini fridge, OC2, LS2, and DS1. Id like to grab (not necessarily all of these) a Julia chorus, microsynth DCX Bass, compressor, and HX stomp
The problem is, I like the bass drive sound and I feel it’s redundant to have both the Carl Martin and revolt running at the same time as the are both tube preamps. Originally I wanted to run into the revolt then FX out to the CM and another gain stage. Having the CM almost rendered the clean channel useless (actually not really, it’s adds a body to the sound). But then I have a pedal replacing a channel, then why have the revolt at all? I’ve ran both together in different configurations and side by side and am at a loss.
The DI out on the revolt is based off an ampeg 810, the mini fridge is bass off an ampeg 810. The Carl Martin is darker but powerful, the revolt is cleaner and more versatile.
The mini fridge is scoop as hell, but not terrible
If I split into two boards I could have the revolt HX combo and the Carl Martin and mini fridge with other effects combo, but then I have two boards. Ideally I’d like one. The Carl Martin adds a special bottom to the sound, but then I have two tube stages in the mix and why not just have one? I could do some creative routing with the LS2, again, why?
And I don’t want to replace the DI on the revolt with the mini fridge DI. The CM and mini fridge is what the revolt aims to be, if it came down to it I do prefer the revolt sound overall but I really enjoy the sound and uniqueness of the Carl Martin. And the clean channel and CM can sound the same but the CM has a special bottom to it.
I’m in the half effects half raw camp, effects are awesome and fun I love them, but I don’t want a large ass board just to play bass.
Would having two tube preamp stages be weird or wasteful? I also feel like the Carl Martin does a better job at that tone hammer sound the CCM guys have.
Hopefully this comes across well, I’m curious how the internet feels as I’m sure I’m not the only one who loses sleep over this, much like how best to mount a rack tom with a 30” bass drum. For reference here is my board compared to the main bassist at the church
Up front I’m a “professional” drummer and drum teacher, whatever that means. I think it just means I pay a lot of taxes and don’t work a 9-5. As a bassist, I play at a larger church that uses IEM, play in student bands, and the occasional small cover band gig.
For a year I’ve used a Two Notes bass revolt, it’s fantastic. I sold it to get a GX100 which I tried for a month and sold it to buy, well another revolt. Sometime the last few weeks I purchased a Carl Martin bass drive, and traded my MISO for a Broughton Mini Fridge DI.
Side note, I sold the revolt the first time because it was extremely functional and almost stale since it worked so well, but after I sold it, I realized how important that it was to “my sound”.
Here’s my dilemma. I don’t want a large board, I don’t want redundancy, and I don’t want to have effects sitting in my closet.
I want a board that “leans” toward CCM but I am also aware that the sound now may not be the sound in 5-10 years, so versatility is preferred.
The board I imagine for that would be tuner-two notes revolt- FX out to HX stomp (which I don’t have) and out.
What I have currently in my collection is a revolt, Carl Martin drive, tuner, mini fridge, OC2, LS2, and DS1. Id like to grab (not necessarily all of these) a Julia chorus, microsynth DCX Bass, compressor, and HX stomp
The problem is, I like the bass drive sound and I feel it’s redundant to have both the Carl Martin and revolt running at the same time as the are both tube preamps. Originally I wanted to run into the revolt then FX out to the CM and another gain stage. Having the CM almost rendered the clean channel useless (actually not really, it’s adds a body to the sound). But then I have a pedal replacing a channel, then why have the revolt at all? I’ve ran both together in different configurations and side by side and am at a loss.
The DI out on the revolt is based off an ampeg 810, the mini fridge is bass off an ampeg 810. The Carl Martin is darker but powerful, the revolt is cleaner and more versatile.
The mini fridge is scoop as hell, but not terrible
If I split into two boards I could have the revolt HX combo and the Carl Martin and mini fridge with other effects combo, but then I have two boards. Ideally I’d like one. The Carl Martin adds a special bottom to the sound, but then I have two tube stages in the mix and why not just have one? I could do some creative routing with the LS2, again, why?
And I don’t want to replace the DI on the revolt with the mini fridge DI. The CM and mini fridge is what the revolt aims to be, if it came down to it I do prefer the revolt sound overall but I really enjoy the sound and uniqueness of the Carl Martin. And the clean channel and CM can sound the same but the CM has a special bottom to it.
I’m in the half effects half raw camp, effects are awesome and fun I love them, but I don’t want a large ass board just to play bass.
Would having two tube preamp stages be weird or wasteful? I also feel like the Carl Martin does a better job at that tone hammer sound the CCM guys have.
Hopefully this comes across well, I’m curious how the internet feels as I’m sure I’m not the only one who loses sleep over this, much like how best to mount a rack tom with a 30” bass drum. For reference here is my board compared to the main bassist at the church
Attachments
Last edited: