• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Unconstitutional A.A.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Come on, even if someone is court ordered to attend meetings they can get around it. There is no way the legal system can verify if someone attended (without ankle monitoring) because it is an anonymous program. I have signed those sheets for people when I have chaired meetings. I don't put my last name, there is no membership lists for the court to double-check. So, if anyone wanted to avoid it, they could.
 
The repeat of the pattern. Many people get just one DUI and they learn from it. The alcoholic does it over and over again. They can't help it.

I don't buy it at all. The alcoholic has a substance addiction. Driving while under the influence is a whole seperate issue. I don't believe there's any compulsion to drive that goes along with alcoholism. Driving while drunk is nothing to do with whether the person has a compulsion to drink or whether they were just slamming a few brews at the weekend. The alcoholic may be drunk more often, but that just means they should leave the car at home more often.
 
Actually, no.
They can only force you to go to jail.
Any treatment alternative is voluntary.

HmmmmI don't know enough about this but I have heard it here (Northern Ca) ordered in a court as part of a plea bargain.


"Judges are increasingly sentencing individuals with DUI- Driving Under the Influence, DWI- Driving While Intoxicated, or DUID- Driving Under the Influence of Drugs offenses to court ordered treatment programs for drugs and alcohol. The goal of this action is to force the individual to participate in a rehab program as an extension of or in substitution for serving out a jail sentence."


Invalid Link Removed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.