• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Using two ABY pedals to split then merge signal

Would this work or be completely redundant?

I am thinking of doing the ol' bass signal split, one effected, one not. One bass into one amp, but splitting the signal with an ABY then merging them back together again at the other end with another one. Aim is to retain the bottom end of the dry signal while adding some nice overdrive over the top.

Would this work or is it a stupid idea?
Is there a far better way of doing this?

Thanks in advance!
 
If I'm reading your OP correctly, with one bass and one amp it does not seem like you would really get what your after ... one clean channel + one effected channel. Possible impedance mismatch aside, once you re-merge the signals and send it into just one amp, your just dealing with one mixed signal. I believe that when players do split their signal into clean + distortion, they usually route those different signals to different amps so each amp/cab handles the two different sounds/tones.

So ...
one bass =>
ABY
A => clean => amp/cab1
B => distortion => amp/cab2
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9
splitting the signal with an ABY then merging them back together again at the other end with another one.
splitting is easy, "merging" is not.

you need to mix the two signals back into one with a dedicated mixing device, which will be a lot more advanced than a simple AB box
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9