TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes. .. well. ... I may know a guy who because of being in a three piece and paying all the taxes for the gigs, essentially did an entire years worth of gigging for free. Or. ... spread out for the band. .. made $60 a show.
I may also know of a venue, who not only wants to write a band name on the check instead of individual names. ... but then charges a cash cover at the door. There by making unreported cash for the venue- and then forcing the band to pay taxes on THEIR pay.
This person/ band may be getting a bit frustrated with the situation. ...
As long as you are being straight up with your taxes, who cares if the venue cheats? That's their problem to live with.
Agreed.Why should it? Many times the venue will cut us a check, and then cash the check out of the register receipts. Gives everyone a paper trail of the money. The IRS says that any contracted labor (as a band would be) to which more $600 is paid in a year, is required to receive a 1099-MISC ... the income is taxable, and is reported to the IRS. This complicates things a bit ... the check is made out to the band leader (so the venue needs his SSN). The band leader pays the rest of the band, and deducts the pay out on the band leaders tax return. Again, if the band leader pays out more the $600/yr to an individual member that member gets a 1099-MISC.
Casual bands that work only once in a while are troubled by all this accounting stuff, but pro bands know how it works. Fortunately, I usually get cash on the barrel head, and we leave the gub'mint out of it whenever we can.
No. ... if the venue is charging a cover for the band. And pocketing it at no tax cost, then writing a check for the band ( that they're going to write off) at no tax cost. ... while said band is still paying taxes on this income- it seems pretty shady to the band no?
The bar makes say. ..$600 tax free ($300 at door, $300 write off of bands pay) and the band makes $200 after taxes?
I have to agree - if the band is being paid - they are supposed to pay a fair amount of taxes ON THAT PAY. The venue is allowed to write that off - that's an expense. If they then cheat in some other way, that's none of the band's business.No. ... if the venue is charging a cover for the band. And pocketing it at no tax cost, then writing a check for the band ( that they're going to write off) at no tax cost. ... while said band is still paying taxes on this income- it seems pretty shady to the band no?
The bar makes say. ..$600 tax free ($300 at door, $300 write off of bands pay) and the band makes $200 after taxes?
Also - if this guy that you may know is paying the taxes for all the band members than he is screwing himself - he needs to write cheques to the other band members to ensure that they share the tax load.Yes. .. well. ... I may know a guy who because of being in a three piece and paying all the taxes for the gigs, essentially did an entire years worth of gigging for free. Or. ... spread out for the band. .. made $60 a show.
I may also know of a venue, who not only wants to write a band name on the check instead of individual names. ... but then charges a cash cover at the door. There by making unreported cash for the venue- and then forcing the band to pay taxes on THEIR pay.
This person/ band may be getting a bit frustrated with the situation. ...
Actually, I have to disagree with that last statement - they're usually on the express route.I have almost always been paid in a cheque by a bar. That is standard practice, you cash the cheque at the bar and it doubles as a receipt. Places that pay you in cash are usually on the slow road to new management.
Let's say that BL in the Hypothetical Band ( they're obviously a jazz metal fusion outfit with a MIDI looper. .) Were to work a deal where no individual person in the band was paid by one venue more than $600 in said year? So BL signs the first two $300 checks, keyboard/drummer signs the next two and guitarist/kudzoo/skinflute signs two. So that would be 6 gigs the band would play that year without the venue requiring an I9 correct? This would make it the bands individual moral responsibility to claim that revenue- assuming they made other monies from other gigs. Kind of like the moral responsibility of waitresses and strippers to claim their tips correct?