• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Warwick backward conversion?

Hi,

Without sounding too obvious - take off the 5th string!

I know, it had to be said.

Now the 'real' answer - if you do this, then take off all the parts
associated with that 5th string that could get loose and fall off.
These would include:
-Tuning machine
-Bridge saddle with adjustment screws

Put these in a little ziploc bag, tape it shut, and put it in a safe place. Back in my garage band days, I saw a lot of basses that lived for too long with a missing string, and eventually lost their parts - which sort of semi-permanently converted them into 3-strings.

Best of luck,
Martin
 
You might also consider stringing it E-A-D-G-C. This is how my fiver is strung (with a Hipshot D-Tuner on the E), and it plays just like a regular four, with an extra high string for occasional chords.
 
in order to do this, would you need to change string sizes? Do you really need the Hipshot D tuner? Just curious.....

You do not the need the hipshot tuner. But this will involve using different string gauges. Either buy a 6 string set and use the top 5, or buy a 4 set and an individual 6th (or all individual). I'm not sure how well the warwick adjustable nut would work for this, but it should be fine.

I string my Ibanez SR905 E-A-D-G-C and find it much more convenient to have the low E at the edge of the fingerboard like a 4.
 
Exactly. I bought a 6-string set, and tucked the low B string away in case I ever wanted to cross to the dark side...

The Hipshot is certainly not necessary. I just like them on 4-stringers, because the low D comes in handy rather frequently.
 

Latest posts