• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Weight vs. Tone

What's more important to you? Weight or Tone

  • Weight

    Votes: 42 18.4%
  • Tone

    Votes: 134 58.8%
  • How much do carrots weigh?

    Votes: 52 22.8%

  • Total voters
    228

LBS-bass

Guest
Nov 22, 2017
16,465
87,326
EDITING TO ADD: THIS IS NOT A QUESTION ABOUT FALSE DICHOTOMIES. THIS IS ABOUT PRIORITIES. I AM WELL AWARE THAT YOU CAN HAVE BOTH. I'M ASKING YOU WHAT YOU PRIORITIZE, IF YOU DO. IF YOU HAVE BOTH ALREADY, TELL ME HOW YOU ACHIEVED IT. THANK YOU.

There are threads here about the importance of weight and there are threads about the importance of tone. My dilemma will eventually be that the tone I want comes in a heavy package. Right now I'm good with the weight of my basses, but they're all on the heavier side, so that could change if I get injured or develop a back problem. At which point I have to decide what's more important to me.

What's more important to you? Weight or tone? And if you have the tone you love in a light bass, let us know what you're playing.
 
Last edited:
There are threads here about the importance of weight and there are threads about the importance of tone. My dilemma will eventually be that the tone I want comes in a heavy package. Right now I'm good with the weight of my basses, but they're all on the heavier side, so that could change if I get injured or develop a back problem. At which point I have to decide what's more important to me.

What's more important to you? Weight or tone? And if you have the tone you love in a light bass, let us know what you're playing.
Best tone, even unamplified, I ever heard was from custom, light weight, passive J bass. I don't have anymore details unfortunately. Just sayin' that weight may not be the overriding factor.

Edit: May have been Basswood
 
Last edited:
without good tone we'd have to face the world as it really is, so tone is of paramount importance.
I've swung towards the minimalist attitude after getting a T-40 and not being blown away by any of it's many colors, different strings my change that, but now that I've got plenty of lightweights with tone galore that's all I focus on when GASsing. my latest, a cheapazz Samick Silvertone is near feather light and full of huevos, the distorted tone is just shy of my #1 and equal in clean settings but much different in inherent tones. the Silvertone is classic P where my PJ Peavey Zodiac BXP (EMG HZs) is all over the place with tone, the bridge PU gives the woody goodness and the P has the most low end and grit of anything I got, plus it's a small comfy package. then there's my LTD B-50, just a brute ...in a skirt lol the petite body would well suit a girl but the neck is all business. my Epi Toby Std. IV and Cort Curbow Retro also knock it out of the tone ballpark and they are skin and bones as well. to paraphrase Kris, weight is just another word with plenty left to lose.
 
To me personally, it's the feel of the instrument that comes first, then the tone.

As for the weight...

I've owned exactly one bass that I deemed too heavy for prolonged use, because it would literally cut off the blood flow in my leg in a matter of minutes if I were playing seated.

When I was young I gigged a bunch of basses that are regarded as boat anchors nowadays (Gibson RD Standard, 70s Fenders, Alu-neck-Kramers...and the list goes on) and it hasn't bothered me one bit.

It still doesn't bother me, albeit for different reasons. If I were to start performing live again, I would have to be sitting. My back does not like the idea of standing for a lengthy period of time, although I can walk for miles without any issues.
 
Last edited:
Of my 4 basses, the heavier ones are tone-monsters. ‘97 L2500 weighs about 10.74, 2014 Squier VM Jazz V weighs 11.2 - massive tone, massive sustain, just plain massive.
My fret less Jazz V build weighs 9.7 and is sort of “alright”. The FrankenSquier is also about 10 or so...it’s alright.
I’ve played a 13lb ‘77 P-bass ... I think that’s where I’d draw the line... but it was awesome!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBS-bass
There is a common perception that denser woods yield a bassier tone. And conversely that lighter woods yield a thinner treblier tone. Whether or not this is true has been the subject of much debate amongst heavy industry hitters. Whether it’s true or not, think of this: I think it’s easier to darken a trebly sound, than brighten up a bassy sound.
 
One word on weight vs Tone: SADOWSKY. I have two, love the tone and they're both 7.5 pounds. One's an NYC 24 Fret with Sadowsky Soapbars and the other is a NYC Satin Deluxe with Sadowsky Hum canceling P/Js. Like them in passive mode, love them in active. And why wouldn't you use that preamp?

I can't count the number of basses I've gone through to this point, vintage boat anchors, active exotics, hollow bodies, etc. I've finally found the sound I need and it has nothing to do with weight.
 
I voted weight, because I can always fix the tone. That of course means that the bass isn't a complete dud in the stability and build department. The neck needs to be stable, frets need to be decently leveled and there shouldn't be any structural issues. A good setup and strings of my choice and it's good to go. If the tone isn't to my liking, then the pickup swap fixes that. Above 9.5 lbs, I don't care how good the tone is because I can get great tone at 9 lbs and less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBS-bass
For me it's not an either/or choice. Both weight and tone are equally important.

I think I've bored everyone enough with my back issues, so I can't choose a bass that weighs more than I can manage. Also I wouldn't choose a bass that didn't sound better than my current bass. I don't have to buy a bass that doesn't exactly fit these requirements.