TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If this were wikipedia that comment would be labelled subjective and someone would edit it out! That's the theory, but the reality is somewhat less black and white....so you don't lose any tone.
If this were wikipedia that comment would be labelled subjective and someone would edit it out! That's the theory, but the reality is somewhat less black and white.
To the OP, look for stuff about the true bypass debate and you'll find plenty of discussion - which you can promptly ignore and just try it out for yourself.
Bump.
Just a quick question. Say I have some effects that I always tend to play simultaneously (i.e. an envelope filter and an octave pedal), and one or two others that I typically just play solo (i.e. synth). With a bypass looper I'd be able to leave them all on and essentially have channels where I can step on each switch and have:
Channel 1: Envelope + Octave
Channel 2: Synth
as well as a completely clean bypass signal?
Fan-freakin-tastic. Thanks.
Bass -> Micro POG WET ---------------------------> Amp
DRY -> Enigma WET ------------/
\ DRY --> Synth -/
\------------/
That's not going to work too well. With the way you've shown it, the only way you'll be able to have the SYB enter your signal chain is if you have both loops 1 AND 3 on, because it will need a signal into it to turn on, and keeping loop 1 off will prevent that from happening. And since the SYB would only be receiving the dry signal from the Micro POG and Enigma, there's no reason to have it not just get its input from the send of loop 3. The LMB-3 and Enigma will only be able to enter your chain if loops 1 and 2 are on as well.