That's a "played without conviction, but not taking any chances" style.I've heard the term "bright" as a self-referential description by some atheists. Now I'm wondering what an "agnostic shuffle" would sound like?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's a "played without conviction, but not taking any chances" style.I've heard the term "bright" as a self-referential description by some atheists. Now I'm wondering what an "agnostic shuffle" would sound like?
Hmm, I have not. Something to ponder though, for sure!I've heard the term "bright" as a self-referential description by some atheists.
I know a drummer that can definitely answer this question for ya !Is there a dull shuffle?
Bouncier....like a happy blues. Id play it a just a smidge more staccato
Yikes: Ab...that doesnt sound fun (edit: something tells me whatever song this is, was originally performed with tuning 1/2 step down from standard, which is a typical blues thing)
I'm perfectly happy sitting on the root of the chord for the intro while the horns have some fun. Once we get to the first verse this thing takes off and I can barely hold on at 144bpm : )...I think it would sound better if you walked around a little bit rather than just hit the root over and over and over.
It actually is a tuba part. It has a second voice for most of the low parts but there are some sections where I'm trying to read Bb and Ab from the extra lines and it is hurting my brain trying to transpose that on the go.Now if the part you showed us was for tuba, you'd have to transpose for bass guitar.
Bright shuffle doesn’t mean that you get a bright sound on your bass. Also, the notes were written on that example and I didn’t see any walking bass lines, only pounding one note.Roundwounds, bridge pickup only. Treble knob on amp dimed. That oughtta be close enough, but I think it would sound better if you walked around a little bit rather than just hit the root over and over and over.
I'd call 144 bpm "faster". If it's open to interpretation I'd probably also lean a bit towards staccato on it to give it a brighter sound."Bright" usually means on the faster side IME.
It would lack soul.I've heard the term "bright" as a self-referential description by some atheists. Now I'm wondering what an "agnostic shuffle" would sound like?
Bright shuffle doesn’t mean that you get a bright sound on your bass. Also, the notes were written on that example and I didn’t see any walking bass lines, only pounding one note.