I don’t really play for money but it’s nice to at least cover expenses. I’m too old to deal with drunk band-members, I’m not saying I require my bandmates to be straight edge but drink at home or even after we’ve played not when it impacts the band. A good size crowd is always nice but I’m fine with the crowd being smaller if they are more into the band instead of passively listening because they are there for something else.This is a spin-off from my last thread, where I was venting about the LS getting drunk to the point of not being able to properly do his job. Some of the responses in that thread made me wonder what different people think constitutes a successful gig. Money? Cheering? Dancing? Drinking? Playing? Sound? ... anything else?
Here’s one that might be a bit odd. I do like to see people having at good time at the gigs I play. But there’s a line that can be crossed with drinking where I feel it negatively impacts the band. There are some venues I don’t like because they’ll allow people to get too drunk before cutting them off out of greed. I don’t want anyone killing someone or themselves driving drunk on the way home from one of our shows, I also don’t want to see people so drunk they are puking or sweaty guys that are drunk take their shirts off that run off all the attractive women. Venues should be responsible and cut people off as soon as they start showing physical signs of being wasted. I’ve seen people who couldn't hardly walk and people who puked get another drink from the bar. That’s screwed up to not care about your customers safety and it makes people not want to go to shows.
Last edited: