• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What medal count do you use?

Internationally most publications use the gold medal count as a marker for who's winning, while here in the US a lot of publications use total medal count.

I like the gold medal count because it's used on Google and I have developed a hatred for Yahoo!'s blogging on the Olympics.

So is China getting that elusive 50th gold medal before closing? (They have 49 as of this posting).
 
Are Catholic priests allowed to compete? The Vatican doesn't have an Olympic team.

Damn, China really needs that last gold medal to reach 50. They literally let a gay Australian to beat them in diving.

"Not that there is anything wrong with that..." but I thought all divers were "gay"?!? :ninja:

Gold medal count is the only one to go by... you're either a winner or a g@wd@mmed LOSER!! ;)
 
It seems to be for this Olympics. But I never remember this being an issue before, it was always *total* medals. When did they switch to golds only?

And, FWIW, the Canadian Olympic Committee uses total medals.

From the IOC's site:

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) does not recognise global ranking per country; the medal tables are displayed for information only.

Furthermore, the results that we publish are official and are taken from the "Official Report" - a document published for each Olympic Games by the Organising Committee. However, for the first Olympic Games (until Antwerp in 1920), it is difficult to give the exact number of medals awarded to some countries, due to the fact that teams were composed of athletes from different countries.

The medal tables by country are based on the number of medals won, with gold medals taking priority over silver and bronze. A team victory counts as one medal.

All the tables of past games I looked at were in order of gold medals. Therefore I would have to conclude that it was the official system of the IOC.
 
I use medals per capita, if that is the case Australia is winning followed by Canada.

lowsound
Always bringing up the rear, eh?

Seriously, I think the "medals per capita" is a decent and overlooked system. The fact that China was able to generate 49 gold medal athletes out of the billion or so citizens it has isn't really amazing. Don't misunderstand me: the performances are, but the fact that the country is leading the gold medal count shouldn't be surprising. They should be leading the medal count, as well.

Mike