What would you think about.....people paying to have billboards put up around your city saying: "Santa Claus isn't real".
Should they be allowed to?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
What would you think about.....people paying to have billboards put up around your city saying: "Santa Claus isn't real".
Should they be allowed to?
stevetx19 said:i want to live in a society where people are allowed to do that. I also want to live in a society where there aren't ***hats who would.![]()
I think you did.
Sure. They also teach them about all sorts of things. Doesn't make it right.
Why not? I wouldn't hesitate to tell my grandchildren the truth. After all, don't they have a right to know?
But this position comes from the presumption that the parents have already perpetuated a fantasy.
There are actually two separate questions at issue here:
1) Is it okay for someone other than a child's parents to tell that child the "truth"?
2) is it okay for a parent to tell a child an "untruth"?
Why do you ask? Is someone planning on doing it?
I don't see the point..
Funky Ghost said:If it's because our kids might learn something from outside the home that we choose not to explain ( painting broad strokes here and not saying YOU or anyone here does that ). That's 99% of most information parents try to hide from their kids isn't it? Drugs, sex, swearing and any other nasty thing we try to "protect" them from. Do you think the sign would be the only place that information would be supplied to our kids from? By the time a child is able to read that, they already know.
No I wasn't aware of that although i am aware of bill boards on buses in the UK a few years ago from atheists. This came from a discussion at lunch today at work about the seemingly odd inconsistency between why people would be upset about someone telling their kids something which is true but comfortable with someone perpetuating a lie to their kids.Mark - did you get this idea from a recent news report? There have been a few reports of some atheist billboards lately. I wont go into detail
I thought of starting a thread on it but figured it wouldn't end well...![]()
No I wasn't aware of that although i am aware of bill boards on buses in the UK a few years ago from atheists. This came from a discussion at lunch today at work about the seemingly odd inconsistency between why people would be upset about someone telling their kids something which is true but comfortable with someone perpetuating a lie to their kids.
No I wasn't aware of that although i am aware of bill boards on buses in the UK a few years ago from atheists. This came from a discussion at lunch today at work about the seemingly odd inconsistency between why people would be upset about someone telling their kids something which is true but comfortable with someone perpetuating a lie to their kids.
This is actually a pretty fascinating question to ponder. I don't think Latimour is being a troll at all.
All I can venture is that the hypothetical parents in question participated in the Santa Claus "game" when they were kids, so they see it as an institution rather than a lie.....
I believe this may be an oblique reference to religious advertisement.
And the point ... It's Latimour: he's stirring the poo.
I disagree about Santa and religion being analogous as for that to be an apt analogy there would need to be a substantial body of people who genuinely believed in the existence of Santa or conversely it be generally accepted that religion was pure fiction, neither or which are the case.yeah, and we seem to have gotten to the heart of this rather quickly. as a parent, i think one of the golden rules is - don't tell other people how to parent! so, i am with matticus on this one. as much as it seems inappropriate to watch people 'lie' to their kids about different things, i don't think we have much choice. certainly some parents abuse their parenting privilege more than others, but if the kid isn't being significantly harmed i can't see how one could do otherwise. of course, 'significant' is relative. and this thread has great potential to turn into a can of worms.
santa can fall into the religious category. and religion is something that people generally feel is solely up to the parents to set. i guess the equalizer is that kids grow up and enter society and start to confront the differences between what their parents told them and what other people think.
as much as it seems inappropriate to watch people 'lie' to their kids about different things, i don't think we have much choice.
I disagree about Santa and religion being analogous as for that to be an apt analogy there would need to be a substantial body of people who genuinely believed in the existence of Santa or conversely it be generally accepted that religion was pure fiction, neither or which are the case.
How about you stay away from religion as per the OT rules. Unless there is some doubt as to the non existence of Santa as per my earlier post I don't think there is any analogy. This thread could have been about unicorns or anything else where there is consensus as to it's fictional status. It's not about areas that are withi the realm of reasonable doubt.That begets the question, and you kind of touched on this with the santa=religious aspect...
Is telling your children about Santa Claus really a lie? Or is it carrying on with tradition?
Not to get into religion, but the analogy is apt, would an atheist telling his/her child that God does not exist be a lie? What about an atheist who never speaks of God to their child and allows the kid to develop their own understanding?
Go on...