TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ah thanks. Because I hear Maple every now and then. So I think I'm going to with maple.Most people, including me, will say maple. But the truth is it doesn't matter.
As long as it has no more than 20 fretsMost people, including me, will say maple.
I've had more basses that slapped better that had maple boards than rosewood.
But I think that may just be a coincidence.
I just posted this in another thread and it's still on my clip board so here -- straight from Marcus Miller's FAQ on his website:
Maplewood is a good deal harder than the other common woods used for bass necks (ebony, rosewood, etc). The sound from a maple neck is harder than the others. I think my thumbing sound would be significantly different without the maple. For finger style I actually prefer a softer wood (rosewood usually) but, if I'm only using one bass, I can make do with the maple.
You would have been better off trusting your ears before you got this information to cloud your perception.
I don't need Marcus Miller to tell me that Maple is brighter and snappier than rosewood, but thanks for the tip.