tom gale's methods are great. they present the very best of simandl and the very best of modern techniques that are expected in today's post simandl era. he does not ignore simandl, he expands on it. when simandl was written basses had gut strings , super high action, and bassists were not expected to be the virtuosos that they are expected to be today. tom gale and mark morton have improved upon simandl. their method is more relavant to the modern player. if you want to sound like a 100 year old bassist then study a 100 year old method. i expect more from my own playing, but if you're happy with that then you need look no further than simandl. it will contain all you need for your playing. i think the fact that it's the "party line" doesnt mean anything. it says nothing to it's effectiveness and relavance. all it shows is that people are lemmings and are unwilling to change. i did study simandl in the beginning, and have spent alot of years trying to unlearn those habits. i wish someone had turned me on to a more modern method when i was young. i do agree that simandl has influenced mr gale in a significant way. it has shown him the shortcomings of modern methods and has caused him to create his own. id say that's fairly significant. having said all that, it might not be a bad idea for mr gale to register as a commercial user. then no one could flame him for trying to help create better bass players.
I don't think people hate that he is recommending his and Mr. Morton's books. They are mad because he is constantly recommending them as the only book that works.